Showing : 21-27 of 27 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 2(4), 17A-- Additional evidence - Court has power to permit any party to examine any witness at any stage - Sub-rule (4) of Rule 2 gives ample power apart from Rule 17-A - Rule 17-A cannot be treated as a bar to permit a party to lead further evidence...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-A, 2-- Order 41 Rule 27 must be read in conjunction with Order 18 Rule 17-A and Order 18 Rule 2 - The object of such provisions is to permit the parties to adduce complete evidence in support of their case and to record such evidence so as to completely adjudicate the dispute between the parties and..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17A-- Non - production of documents after exercise of due diligence - Very foundation for application under Rule 17A - Compliance of this condition - Must be seen in context to facts and circumstances of the case and in conformity with record before Court - Expression exercise of due diligence - Should..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 2(4)-- Court can permit a party to examine any witness at any stage for reasons to be recorded in writing - Powers given to Court under sub - rule (4) of Rule 2 of Order 18 - Cannot be curtailed by reading into it the provisions of Rule 17 - A of Order 18...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17, 17A-- Application as per heading under Order 18 Rule 17 for summoning of witness but prayer shows that witness required to be summoned for further cross - examination - Only a typographical mistake of nomenclature of provision of law - Though provision of law not correctly stated but contents of..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17, 17-A-- Application of defendant for summoning petition writer for further cross examination - Application filed U.O.18.R.17 CPC - Allowed - Contention that witness could not be cross-examined even if application allowed - Held, contents of application clearly show that application in fact was under..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1990
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-A-- Additional evidence - Plaintiff could have produced Handwriting expert earlier after exercise of due diligence - Provisions of Order 18 Rule 17-A not attracted...........

Showing : 21-27 of 27 Results