Showing : 1011-1020 of 1190 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 21, Rule 90-- Auction sale - Cancellation - Right would accrue to auction purchaser only on confirmation of sale - Not permissible for auction purchaser to claim compensation by way of interest on money deposited by him when auction sale has been set aside...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11, Order 21, Rule 22, 23-- Order passed under O.21.R.23(2) operates as res judicata in all further proceedings - If notice under Order 21 Rule 22 is not given objection to executability can be raised at a later stage...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 22-- Objections - Envisaged by R.22 are objections in regard to the executability of the decree and not with regard to the validity of the decree...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 89-- Execution sale - Application to set aside - Person entitled to purchase same immovable property under contract for sale - Held, such person has no locus standi to apply U.O.21.R.89 CPC...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, 153, Order 21, Rule 17, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 136-- Execution - Mode of Execution - Amendment - Can be allowed only if sought within period of limitation - Amendment sought after 17 years from date of decree - Barred by limitation - Powers under Ss.151 and 153 of Code cannot be invoked to remove the bar of limitation...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 89, 92-- Auction sale - Setting aside under rule 92 - Order is appealable...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 89, 92(2)-- Auction sale - Shortfall in deposit owing to clerical or arithmetical mistake of depositor - Order of Court extending time for making up the deficiency - Order is not appealable U.O.43.R.1 CPC...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 89, 92-- Auction sale - Deficiency in deposit - Extending time - Held, Court can extend time on ground of clerical or arithmetical mistake in calculation of amount of deposit either by Court staff or by depositor...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 97-- Execution - Application by third party claiming half share without dispossession - Application treated as obstruction - Held, such application is maintainable and adjudication is justified...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1996
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 21, Rule 98, 103-- Execution - Application by third party claiming half share without dispossession - Application treated as obstruction - Order amounts to decree - Only appeal lies and no revision is maintainable against the order...........

Showing : 1011-1020 of 1190 Results