Showing : 871-880 of 1349 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 35, 36-- Decree passed that actual possession shall be delivered to D.H. only on such part of the property as would be in actual possession of the defendants and will get symbolic possession of that property which is in possession of sub-tenants - D.H. seeking actual possession from sub-tenants - Allowed..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 32(3)-- Violation of terms of decree - Evidence required to prove the allegations is equivalent to the one required in a criminal case and the charge has to be proved to the hilt...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90-- Sale - Setting aside - Sale cannot be set aside merely on irregularity in publishing or conducting sale - Sale can be set aside if there is material irregularity or fraud in conducting or publishing the sale and there is irreparable injury...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90-- Sale - Notice not given to J.D. for drawing up sale proclamation - Amounts to substantial injury - Sale set aside...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90-- Auction sale - Setting aside - Mere inadequacy of price is not a ground to set aside auction sale - However if there is material irregularity in conducting the sale leading to substantial injury to J.D. then sale has to be set aside...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 127-- Auction sale - Setting aside - Limitation - Notice not given to J.D. for drawing up sale proclamation - Sale is a nullity - There is no question of 60 days limitation in making application for setting aside sale...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 66-- Sale without notice to J.D. is nullity - Jurisdiction to sell the right arises in a Court only where the owner is given notice of the execution for attachment and sale of his property - On notice owner can offer his estimate as he is the person who intimately knew the value of his property..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97-- Execution - Objections by a stranger are maintainable - All the disputes between a third party and decree holder must be decided in the execution proceeding itself...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 21, Rule 97-- Stay of execution during pendency of application U.O.21.R.97 - Executing Court is competent to grant stay of execution under section 151 CPC...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103-- Execution - Possession - Obstruction from 'Any person' - All questions including questions relating to right, title or interest in the property arising between the aggrieved party whether he is the decree holder or any other person in possession of the immovable property under execution shall be..........

Showing : 871-880 of 1349 Results