Showing : 891-900 of 1349 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 89, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 127-- As amended in 1974 - Auction sale - Setting aside on deposit - Limitation is 60 days as prescribed under Art.127 Limitation Act (Amended in 1974) and not 30 days as prescribed under Order 21.R.92(2) CPC...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97, 99-- Mere possession of claimant is not sufficient - Claimant has also to show a right to possession independent of the J.D...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 54, 55, 58-- Attachment order - Withdrawal or varying the attachment order - Without determination of the questions U.O.21.R.58(2) Court has no jurisdiction to pass any order varying the orders of attachment...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 66(2)-- Sale proclamation - Valuation of property - Both D.H. and J.D. are entitled to estimate the value of property - However Court can confirm the sale if the property fetches less than the estimated value of the property given in proclamation - Estimate of value only gives a rough idea to the..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 35-- Possession - Delivered in execution - Report of bailiff or submission of D.H. that possession has been delivered - Objection of J.D. that it is only a paper delivery and he is still in possession - Held, objection is not maintainable...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 32-- Decree of permanent injunction - Can be executed against the legal representatives of the deceased J.D. - Violation of decree by son and grand son of J.D. - Decree can be executed only against son and not against grandson who is not L.R. of deceased...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 64, 66-- Execution for sale of property attached before judgment - Specific boundaries of property given by which property can be identified - Rejection of execution petition on the ground that door number given in attachment list and in execution petition differ - Not legal...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 11-- Exparte decree - Executable as a contested decree...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 34-- Exparte decree - Execution of registered deed of reconveyance - Exparte decree is executable as a contested decree - J.D. unsuccessful in his attempts to get the exparte decree set aside - It has become final - Order of Executing Court dismissing the execution petition as not maintainable -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97, 108-- Decree for specific performance - Execution - Delivery of possession not mentioned in decree - Possession can still be delivered in execution - Court while allowing the prayer of specific performance vests in executing Court with all the powers which are required to give full effect to the decree..........

Showing : 891-900 of 1349 Results