Showing : 901-910 of 1349 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 64, 90-- Auction sale - Setting aside - Mere inadequacy of price is not a ground for setting aside the Court sale...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90-- Sale - Setting aside - Sale notification published in newspaper approved by Court - Objection not taken at the time of publication or subsequent thereto - Sale cannot be set aside on the ground that paper in which notification is published is not a widely circulated local newspaper...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90-- Sale - Setting aside - D.H. and auction purchaser related to each other - Sale cannot be set aside unless J.D. establishes that property was sold for a low price and that he suffered substantial injury thereby - Property sold at a price higher than the value fixed by Court - There is competitive..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 69(2)-- Sale - Adjournment - Fresh publication of sale notification - If interval between one adjournment and the other is less than 30 days then fresh sale publication need not be made - Taking aggregate of all adjournments not permissible - Even if there is any irregularity in publication of sale..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90-- Court sale - Setting aside - Once a decree is passed and sale notification issued, decree cannot be treated as instalment decree merely because J.D. paid some amount on each and every date to which execution was adjourned for sale of property at his instance and D.H. accepted the amount paid -..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90-- Sale - Setting aside - Upset price fixed by Court taking into account value fixed by Court amin and also relying on sale deeds produced - Objection not taken by J.D. about the value at the time of sale notification or subsequent thereto - Held, value fixed by Court is proper...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 99-- No actual physical dispossession in execution of decree - As such application U.O.21.R.99 is not maintainable - So adjudication of right of third party and claim over the property is outside the scope and jurisdiction of executing Court...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 76, 79(3), 80-- Execution - Sale of shares - Restriction on transfer by Articles of Company - Held, Court sale of such shares does not have effect of removing restriction - Company is well within its right to refuse to register transfer of shares in favour of auction purchaser...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 84-- Auction sale - Auction purchaser has to deposit 25% of purchase money immediately - Sale to be continued on failure to deposit this amount - Period to deposit cannot be extended - Failure to deposit renders sale a complete nullity and confirmation thereof and issuance of sale certificate has no..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, 151, Order 21, Rule 99-- Eviction decree - Execution - Objection by stranger - Not maintainable - If he is in possession in his own right he can put resistance at time of delivery of possession - After dispossession he can take resort to O.21.R.99 - Even on facts appellant being son of tenant and having knowledge of suit..........

Showing : 901-910 of 1349 Results