Showing : 931-940 of 1349 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 97, 35-- Obstruction by stranger to the decree - The remedy available to the decree holder against such an obstructionist is only U.O.21.R.97(1) - Decree holder cannot bypass such obstructionist and insist on reissuance of warrant for possession under O.21.R.35 with police force - Such course will amount..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 35-- Execution - Pecuniary jurisdiction - Original valuation of the suit governs the jurisdiction of executing Court - It is not at all necessary to put fresh valuation...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 101-- Powers given to the executing Court under rule 101 are not qualified or hedged by any restrictions - Executing Court is required to adjudicate upon all questions mentioned in the said rule as if it had jurisdiction to deal with every question that may so arise - By a legal fiction, an executing..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(j), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9-- Dismissal in default of application U.O.21.R.90 - Appeal against - Applicant cannot file an appeal since, a dismissal in default is not a decree...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 21, Rule 90, 106-- Dismissal in default of application U.O.21.R.90 - Revision against - J.D. cannot invoke the jurisdiction u/s 115 - Substantive remedy by way of an application U.O.21.R.106 is available...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 92, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 34, Rule 5-- Auction sale - Objections - Dismissed - Sale confirmed - Held, if an appeal is pending against an order refusing to set aside the sale, it is open to J.D. to make necessary deposits to save his property - Sale does not become absolute or irrevocable merely on passing an order confirming the sale -..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 51, Order 21, Rule 37, 38-- First Proviso - Surety - Arrest and detention - A person on whose surety the money is advanced cannot later on plead that he is a person having no means...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108-- Frivolous objections need not to be put to trial...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108-- Execution - Objections - Property purchased after passing of the decree - Person who transferred the property to the objector had prima facie no title to the property on the date of execution of the sale deed - Objections that objector was not party to the suit and was a bona fide purchaser as..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 51, Order 21, Rule 30-- Money decree against all the defendants including the guarantor and mortgage decree against principal debtor who had mortgaged his shop with the bank - Decree did not put any fetter on the right of the D.H. to execute it against any party whether as a money decree or as a mortgage decree - Held,..........

Showing : 931-940 of 1349 Results