Showing : 931-940 of 1190 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 64, 90, 66(2)-- Part of the property sufficient to satisfy the decree - Objection not raised when notice of attachment was served and when proclamation of sale was settled - Entire property put to sale - Held, after sale objection cannot be raised that part of property is sufficient to satisfy the decree - Sale..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 127-- Auction sale - Setting aside - Limitation is sixty days from the date of sale - Sale in June 1987 and application filed in June 1990 - Application is barred by limitation...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 35-- Symbolic possession if can be delivered under the decree - Decree-holder cannot be restrained from obtaining physical possession of land - Symbolic possession of land given to decree-holder and physical possession not released as decree-holder refused to pay costs of crops - After crops have been..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21-- Execution - Death of D.H. or J.D. - If execution petition is filed within time and D.H. or J.D. dies and L.R's are not brought on record then there is no abatement of the execution petition - It is open for the L.R's of D.H. to come on record at any time as no time limit is prescribed to bring the..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 99, 101, 103-- Decree for possession - Third party dispossessed in execution of decree - Not barred from filing a separate suit...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 26, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13- - Challenge in revision to blanket stay of execution of ex parte decree without imposing any terms and conditions on judgment - debtor in proceedings under Order 9 Rule 13 for setting aside ex parte decree - Normally such order does not call for any interference by High Court - Fact that suit filed..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, 85-- Auction-purchaser not paid the purchase money within 15 days as required by O.21.R.85 - High Court directed appellant to pay loss suffered by auction purchaser as at his instance sale set aside after 15 years - Held, as the auction purchaser did not pay the purchase money within 15 days sale was..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 29-- Title to property or possession if remains the same - Order 21 Rule 29 not applicable - Judgment-debtor or his successor cannot resort to this rule merely because a plea was not put forward, which plea was open to him at the time when decree was passed against him on earlier occasion - Not open to..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, 64-- A portion of property would fetch the decree amount - Objection not raised before proclamation of sale - Still such a contention can be taken up in proceeding under O.21.R.90 CPC...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108-- Objection petition - Opportunity to lead evidence - Held, it is not incumbent upon the executing Court that it must put to trial every objections which are filed in any execution proceeding, even if prima facie they appear to be frivolous, vexatious and are only intended to delay the execution and..........

Showing : 931-940 of 1190 Results