Showing : 941-950 of 1349 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 26-- Mere pendency of an appeal does not amount to stay of execution proceedings - Appeal pending against dismissal of application U.O.9.R.13 CPC - No stay granted - Executing Court cannot stall execution proceedings...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 84, 72-- D.H. participated in auction proceedings with permission of Court - D.H. is not required to deposit 1/4th of the sale price...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 37-- Money decree - Execution - Arrest and detention of J.D. - Means of J.D. - In calculation of means of J.D. property which is exempt from attachment shall be left out...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 37-- Money decree - Execution - Arrest and detention of J.D. - Means of J.D. - Property which is exempt from attachment is to be left out - Burden lies on D.H. to show that the property which is said to constitute means alleged to be possessed by J.D. is not of the kind which is not liable for..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 102, 98(2)-- Suit for possession - Execution - Objection by a person who purchased the property during pendency of suit - Any order or decree passed against transferor binds the transferee pendente lite - Applicant is not entitled to any relief - An inquiry would be an exercise in futility in view of the..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 54, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 38, Rule 5-- Attachment before judgment - In execution no separate attachment is necessary when property was attached before judgment...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 66, 54-- Notice under O.21.R.66(2) to J.D. before settling sale proclamation not necessary when once O.21.R.54 is complied with by issuing notice at the stage of attachment to furnish value of the property for settling sale proclamation...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 66(2)-- Proclamation of sale - Notice - Served on J.Ds. - One of the J.D. filed counter but remained ex parte without participating in proceedings - Notice issued proper - Finalisation of proclamation proceedings in the absence of J.Ds. - Not illegal...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90-- Sale - Not liable to be set aside unless J.D. sustained substantial injury by reason of such irregularity or fraud - Irregularity must be a material irregularity - Inadequacy of price realised in sale must be proved to have been caused by reason of material irregularity or fraud - Reduction of..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 90, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 34, Rule 4, 5-- Mortgage property - Sale - At the stage of an application U.O.21.R.90, J.D. cannot challenge sale on the ground that the executing Court should have or could have directed sale of only a portion of the mortgage property...........

Showing : 941-950 of 1349 Results