Showing : 481-490 of 624 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3, 4-- (As in P&H) - L.R's - There is no limitation for bringing on record the L.R's of the deceased plaintiff/defendant - L.R's are entitled to be brought on record at any time - Suit not to abate in case L.R's are not brought on record...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 5-- L.R's. - Substitution - A decision under O.22.R.5 CPC does not operate as res judicata between the same parties or their successors in interest or their privies, in a subsequent proceeding, even when the said parties had been provided an opportunity to contest the issue and lead the evidence..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 5, 9-- Eviction petition - Son as sub lessee impleaded as a party - Death of tenant - Son as sub lessee and L.R. of tenant fulfils both capacities - No question of abatement of petition - Application of son for abatement rightly dismissed...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3-(As in P&H) - L.R's - Impleadment - Limitation - There is no limitation for making an application for impleading L.Rs. after amendment in O.22.R.3 by Punjab and Haryana High Court - The lis of the parties should not fail on technicalities and procedural wrangles...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 144, Order 22, Rule 10-- Restitution - Transferee pendente lite - Remedy of restitution is available against transferee pendente lite also - A transferee pendente lite is a representative of the transferor and is also a person bound by the decree, even though he is not made a party to the suit or appeal...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 22, Rule 10-- Execution - Impleading of New Managing Partner of D.H. firm in execution - Allowed...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 22, Rule 3-- In ignorance of sole plaintiff/appellant if a decree is passed the same is nullity...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 22, Rule 3-- Sole plaintiff - Death - L.R's not brought on record - In ignorance of death decree passed - Decree passed is a nullity - Such decree is appealable for getting its nature decided and also on other permissible questions of law - Appeal cannot be thrown overboard only on ground that in execution..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 6-A, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 22, Rule 3, 4-- Failure to substitute deceased defendant in counter-claim - No abatement of counter-claim inasmuch as once legal representatives of deceased plaintiff brought on record, no requirement under law to substitute deceased defendant in counter-claim - As substitution made by plaintiff in the suit, the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 3-- Substitution of legal representatives of deceased plaintiff PRG holder of power of attorney - Agreement for sale executed by RA in favour of PRG and RA also executed power of attorney in favour of PRG - Suit by PRG for declaration and permanent injunction restraining defendant RA from interfering..........

Showing : 481-490 of 624 Results