Showing : 21-30 of 51 Results

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, 3-- Temporary injunction - Dismissal of suit for permanent injunction - Appeal against - Grant of temporary injunction without endorsement regarding service to defendant - Order of status quo passed - Impugned order does not indicate that there was an urgency in the matter - O.39.R.3 CPC not complied..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Divorce Act, 1869, Section 10, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 31, 32, 19, 20, 21, 22, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A-- Wife filed petition for divorce - During pendency of petition, wife sought protection under Section 18 to 22 of Domestic Violence Act - Family court granted protection - Breach of protection order by husband - Family court has jurisdiction to levy penalty under Section 32(3) of Domestic Violence..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Joint Hindu Family Property - Sale by Karta - If property is sold by Karta, no injunction can be granted and only course open is to challenge the alienation on the ground of act of bad management. 2003(3) Civil Court Cases 578 followed...........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226-- Execution proceeding - Writ petition - Original decree holders have no objection for approximately 3.5 decimals of land to be retained by respondent No.7 as per the court's order - Even they have no objection in vacating the stay granted by High Court so long as respondent No.7 is not doing any..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Employee - Relieved from one department but not allowed to join any of the departments - Petitioner employee of Haryana Tourism relived from his duty and asked to report to Haryana Govt. - Petitioner not accepted either by Haryana Govt. or by Haryana Tourism Corporation -..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary mandatory injunction - Can be granted - Principles governing are (1) The plaintiff has a strong case for trial i.e., a higher standard than a prima facie case that is normally required for a prohibitory injunction; (2) It is necessary to prevent irreparable or serious injury which..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Departmental proceedings - Stay during pendency of criminal proceedings launched on the same set of facts - AIR 1997 SC 13 followed wherein held : (i) Both proceedings can continue simultaneously; (2) If charge in criminal case is of a grave nature which involves complicated questions of law and..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A-- Injunction - Disobedience - It is only wilful disobedience of injunction order which invites punitive action depriving a person of his personal liberty and property - Expression 'wilful' means a deliberate or voluntary or intentional Act - Unintentional disobedience is not enough to justify an..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Restraint order in favour of plaintiff restraining defendant from (1) alienating suit property (2) from cutting and removing trees (3) from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff - Order confirmed by High Court in appeal - In the same suit an application filed by defendant seeking..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2001
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Trade mark - Temporary injunction - Action for passing of and infringement of trade mark - Both appellant and respondent carrying on similar business of plywood and wood products - Both using 'UNIPLY' and 'UNIBOARD' as trade marks - Both filing separate suits and seeking temporary injunction -..........

Showing : 21-30 of 51 Results