Showing : 41-50 of 101 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Flats were sold away by appellant No 1 in 1983 - Additional FSI or facility of TDR was made available by Govt. in 1994 - Appellants prima facie did not have any right, title or interest either in said plot or on building standing on that plot - Held, if under any new scheme..........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1-- Temporary injunction - Defendant No.5 has been presumed to have been sufficiently served - Trial Court by an ex parte order restrained defendant Nos.1 to 4 from delivering possession of suit property to defendant Nos.5 and 6 - Appeal by defendant No.5 against said order - Distt. Judge held that..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Temporary injunction - Pending application - Expedite disposal - Writ petition for - Question involved is of trivial nature - Held, writ petition is disposed of with direction to Court below to dispose of application for grant of temporary injunction U.O.39.Rr.1 and 2 CPC expeditiously within a..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Ex parte ad interim injunction - When can be granted - Held, it is only when an application U.O.39.Rr.1 and 2 CPC is filed by a plaintiff at the initial stage of suit that trial Court is required to pass orders awaiting service of notice - Even in such cases, Court has to record reasons for..........
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 7-- Local inspection of premises - Application by defendant - Rejection - Legality - Prayer rejected for local inspection regarding points 1 and 3 of application for local inspection without assigning any reason at all - Held, defendant is entitled to a decision as to why points 1 and 3 did not..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 52-- Temporary injunction - Grant of - Sale pendente lite - Effect of provision of S.52 of TPA - Held, provisions of S.52 of the TPA though may be used in cases of sales which came in existence during the pendency of suit or in other fit and appropriate cases but that does not make the provisions of..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1979, Section 2(42), 315(1), 324- - Temporary injunction - Exhibitio, cum-sale in temporary stalls without licence - Prohibition as to - Held, it will be a private market within the meaning of S.2(42) of the Municipal Corporation Act - Premises where exhibitio, cum-sale is held by petitioners are not a municipal market and so would..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A-- Interim injunction - Violation - Ad interim injunction granted directed defendant No.1 shall not convene any meeting of the Trust to discuss the agenda - However meeting was convened - Application filed U.O.39.R.2-A CPC against Secretary for violation of stay order - Application disallowed - Held,..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1-- Temporary injunction - Exparte interim injunction or interim injunction after notice or interim injunction after deciding the application finally, are all orders U.O.39.R.1 & 2 CPC against which an appeal lies u/s 43 rule 1 CPC...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2-- Interim injunction - Nuisance - It is not in dispute that flour mill is being run by respondent No.1 for the last one year with aid of tractor - Lower appellate court held that by grant of electric connection noise and pollution likely to come down and would not enhance the same - Held, it could..........

Showing : 41-50 of 101 Results