Showing : 311-320 of 1240 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Plaint cannot be rejected in part U.O.7.R.11 CPC...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Cause of action - Lack of clarity when cause of action arose - Conclusive view cannot be taken at the preliminary stage of deciding if plaint is liable to be rejected...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11(d), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 32, Rule 3-- Rejection of plaint - Suit against minor - Suit against minor by itself is not barred - O.22.R.3 CPC provides the manner in which suit can proceed against minor...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Partition suit - Expression `discloses a cause of action' pertains to existence of only of sufficient pleading with respect to existence of Hindu Undivided Family and its properties...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Court while deciding an application U.O.7.r.11 CPC has to accept as true and correct only what has been pleaded in plaint...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Non-filing of written statement - Filing of an application U.O.7.R.11 CPC does not mean that there is an automatic stay for filing of written statement...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Partition suit - Filed by minor through his mother - Facts of case show that there is unnecessary harassment of plaintiff - Till date written stamen is not filed by defendants - What is the extent of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) properties and its various businesses are all..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Recovery suit - Nothing pleaded against petitioner/defendant in the plaint and no cause of action disclosed against him - Plaint rejected against petitioner/defendant...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 134, 135, Copyright Act, 1957, Section 55, 62, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 19, 20, 151, Order 7, Rule 10, 11(a), (b)-- Composite suit restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright and rendition of accounts - Jurisdiction - Suit filed in a Court at place `A' - Held, once composite suit restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright and rendition of accounts including passing off, had been filed in a Court at..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Order to pay ad valorem court fee - Suit for specific performance filed though merely because of jugglery of words a decree of declaration sought - For all intents and purposes decree for specific performance of agreement of sale was sought - Order directing plaintiff to pay..........

Showing : 311-320 of 1240 Results