Showing : 51-57 of 57 Results

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 37, Rule 4, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Scope - Both the provisions not synonymous - Under O.37.R.4 applicant has to sow 'special circumstances' preventing him from entering appearance within stipulated period - In case of O.9.R.13 applicant has to satisfy the Court about 'sufficient cause' preventing him from appearing when suit was..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree - Setting aside - Petitioner a rustic villager and an illiterate person residing in a remote village - Reasons for absence stated that his Advocate told him to come to Court only on receipt of a letter from him to give evidence and that no letter was received by him - Sufficient..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1993
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 9, Rule 13-- In the absence of requisite conditions having been fulfilled as stipulated in the provision contained in O.9 R.13 CPC court has no jurisdiction to set aside the exparte decree and restore the suit...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1993
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 9, Rule 13-- Exparte decree-Setting aside - In absence of requisite conditions stipulated in O.9R.13 fulfilled, Court cannot have jurisdiction to set aside ex parte decree by having resort to Inherent jurisdiction...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1991
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Pending trial of an application under order 9 Rule 13 Court has no power to order to deposit the costs of the suit or furnish security for the decretal amount or to impose conditions...........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1990
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 10-- Court straight way pronounced judgment followed by a decree when written statement not filed inspite of several adjournments - Application U.O.9 R. 13 CPU is not maintainable...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1987
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Proviso & O.5.R.19-A - Exparte decree - Setting aside - Substituted service - Summons not served by registered post despite specific Court order - Not a mere irregularity within the meaning of Proviso to O.9. R.13 CPC...........

Showing : 51-57 of 57 Results