Showing : 11-20 of 201 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Restoration of restoration application dismissed in default - Decree holder should not have contested the application and could have given statement for restoration of the same subject to any terms and conditions - Application filed U.O.9.R.13 CPC ordered to be restored and two effective..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte divorce decree - Setting aside - Proceedings U.O.9.R.13 CPC are not rendered infructous for the mere fact that husband contracted a second marriage after passing of ex parte decree of divorce in his favour...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 5, Rule 20(3), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 27-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Service of summons on defendant without mentioning therein a specific day, date, year and time cannot be held as "summons duly served" on defendants within the meaning of O.9.R.13 CPC, as such summons and service effected pursuant thereto cannot be held to be in..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex pare decree - Setting aside - Defendant against whom ex parte decree is passed has two options: (i) to file appeal; (ii) to file an application U.O.9.R.13 CPC - Defendant can take recourse to both proceedings simultaneously - Right of appeal is not taken away by filing an application U.O.9.R.13..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex pare decree - Setting aside - Defendant against whom ex parte decree is passed has two options: (i) to file appeal; (ii) to file an application U.O.9.R.13 CPC - Defendant can take recourse to both proceedings simultaneously - Right of appeal is not taken away by filing an application U.O.9.R.13..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Eviction petition - Omission on the part of tenant or his counsel to know next date fixed in the case clearly appears to willful in nature - Record reveals that counsel of tenant present on the date fixed for hearing - But no such challenge regarding presence of..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex-parte decree - Setting aside - Suit for recovery - Defendant got Court record inspected through advocate after passing of ex-parte decree and filed application U.O.9.R.13 CPC after 1-1/2 year without being accompanied by application for condonation of delay - Moreover, defendant entered into..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - When an application U.O.9.R.13 CPC is invoked, defendant can also invoke remedy u/s 96 of the CPC and that invocation of one would not be, in any manner, contrary or exclusive to the other...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Remedy of application U.O.9.R.13 CPC and S.96 CPC are not mutually exclusive - They are virtually concurrent in their field of operation...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 96, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Remedy of application U.O.9.R.13 CPC and S.96 CPC - When O.9.R.13 CPC provides that a decree can be set aside for reason that defendant was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing on date when case was called whereas u/s 96 CPC, he would obtain the right to assail decree..........

Showing : 11-20 of 201 Results