Showing : 11-20 of 50 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 21, Rule 58-- Attachment - Objections - Framing of issues - Though, it is not necessary to frame issues in all cases requiring adjudication of objection petition U.21.R.58 CPC, but as third party claims right, title and interest in attached property in its own right as owner, the decision of such objections not..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Eviction proceedings - During pendency of appeal against eviction order an application filed for impleadment of party to the proceedings on ground that applicant is a co-owner - Co-owner is not a necessary party in an eviction petition - Order dismissing application calls..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Impleading a party and amendment of plaint - Suit for specific performance - Plea in written statement that wife is owner of part of the property - Proposed party is the wife of the defendant and she is owner of part of the property and her presence would be necessary to enable the court to..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Impleading of a party - Broad principles governing are : (1) Court can, at any stage of the proceedings, either on an application made by the parties or otherwise, direct impleadment of any person as party, who ought to have been joined as plaintiff or defendant or whose presence before the Court..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment of necessary party - Suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction - Brother and sisters of transferee of suit land and mother of defendants i.e. widow of son of original owner of suit land were necessary parties - Non-impleadment of said necessary parties to suit, improper...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Petitioner unable to demonstrate with reference to any material that either she is owner or in possession of the property in dispute - Thus, it could not be said that she is necessary and proper party to be impleaded in this suit...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - In a suit for declaration in respect of property if a person has no interest or right over the property, he is neither a necessary nor proper party but if he claims to be the owner of the property or otherwise in possession thereto in his own rights, in his absence..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consent decree-- Principles and necessity of registration - (1) The family settlement must be a bona fide one so as to resolve family disputes and rival claims by a fair and equitable division or allotment of properties between the various members of the family; (2) The said settlement must be voluntary and should..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Plaint - Amendment - Plaintiffs sought for amendment incorporating owner and landlord of property as a party in suit as suit was filed before Judge Small Causes Court by a person who was holder of power of attorney on behalf of owner/landlord - Only array of parties was considered and nature of..........
CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)-- Transportation service - Necessary party - Non - impleadment of necessary parties - Held that in a proceeding against the transporter truck owner, driver or insurer is not necessary party...........

Showing : 11-20 of 50 Results