Showing : 31-40 of 50 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13(3)(a)(i), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Necessary party - Suit filed by landlady seeking eviction of tenant - Tenant denied relationship of landlord and tenant alleging that father-in-law of the landlady was owner and landlord - Held, father-in-law is a necessary party and thus entitled to be impleaded as petitioner...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Consent decree-- Family settlement - (1) The family settlement must be a bona fide one so as to resolve family disputes and rival claims by a fair and equitable division or allotment of properties between the various members of the family; (2) The said settlement must be voluntary and should not be induced by..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10(2)-- Suit for specific performance of agreement - Whether a person who is not party to agreement to sell and claiming to be joint owner of suit property, proper and necessary party to the suit. Held - No. Krishan Lal's case 1986 PLJ 629 relied...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of party - Suit for specific performance - A co-owner is not a necessary party...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Adverse possession-- A person who claims adverse possession should show: (a) on what date he came into possession, (b) what was the nature of his possession, (c) whether the factum of possession was known to the other party, (d) how long his possession has continued, and (e) his possession was open and undisturbed - A..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order VI, Rule 17-- Amendment of Plaint - Application for amendment filed after framing of issues and case fixed for plaintiff evidence - Original suit filed for declaration to the effect that the plaintiff is co-owner in respect of the suit property being a co-sharer - Amendment sought that the plaintiff is the..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 166, 168-- Joint tort feasors - Composite negligence - Death on account of act of two vehicles - Owner, driver and Insurer of one of the vehicles can be sued and it is not necessary to sue owner, driver and insurer of both the vehicles - Claimant may impleaded owner, driver and insurer of both the vehicles..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Adverse possession-- Plea of - Not a pure question of law but a blended one of fact and law - A person who claims adverse possession should show (a) on what date he came into possession, (b) what was the nature of his possession, (c), whether the factum of possession was known to the other party, (d) how long his..........
GUJARAT STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AHMEDABAD
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d)-- Consumer - Beneficiary - Necessary party - Complainants not parties to the contract of Insurance - Contracting party being the owner of the vehicle not joined as party to the complaints before the Ld. Forum - It is he who will have to explain the passage of period of limitation because he will..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Suit for specific performance - Applicant seeking to be impleaded as a party on assertion that he is owner in possession of the suit property - Held, in a suit for specific performance for settling the questions involved in the suit presence of strangers is not necessary -..........

Showing : 31-40 of 50 Results