Showing : 41-50 of 51 Results

MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Carriers Act, 1865, Section 9-- Transport service - Deficiency in service - Necessary party - Two consignments were entrusted to the opposite party a common carrier for being taken to its destination - OP failed to carry and deliver the goods to the consignees as required by the complainant-consignor - The OP held to be guilty..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Adverse possession-- Possession must be adequate in continuity, in publicity and in extent - A plea required to show when possession became hostile so that starting point of limitation against affected party can be found - Established on record that plaintiffs in continuous, hostile and open possession of disputed..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - Suit for possession and mandatory injunction - Suit property transferred by defendant during pendency of suit - Presence of transferee is not only proper but necessary because without their presence the matter cannot be adjudicated properly - Any person claiming to be the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleading of a party - A bonafide purchaser of the property during the pendency of litigation without any knowledge of such litigation becomes owner of the property and is entitled to be heard before any order is passed affecting his vital interest in the property - He is a necessary party to be..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Application for impleadment by Punjab Wakf Board claiming to be owner of property as per Central Gazette Notification and relying on judgment of Civil Court which held Punjab Wakf Board to be owner of these properties and further plaintiffs themselves moved applications to Wakf Board for allotment..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Impleadment in a suit for declaration - Plaintiff claiming to be owner in possession having perfected title by way of adverse possession - Applicant claiming present suit to be collusive to frustrate right of applicant in the suit filed for recovery of money which applicant forced to pay as surety..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9-- Necessary party - owner of the land is not a necessary party to the suit so long as none of the parties shave claimed any right specifically against the owner...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1993
Details
Co-owner-- Impleading of Co-owner as a party to the suit Co-owner filed suit claiming exclusive title to the property in derogation or denial of the rights of the other co-owners - Co-owner whose rights are denied or against whose interest the plaintiff is suing is a necessary party to the suit-His absence..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1990
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Addition of a party - Suit for specific performance - Impleading of mortgagee as a party - Mortgagee not a necessary or proper party - No relief is claimed against mortgagee and he is not a party to agreement of sale-Whoever is the owner of the property is immaterial for a mortgagee - His claim is..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1989
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 10-- Suit for specific performance of contract of sale - Person not a party to the agreement claiming to be joint owner of suit property - Not entitled to be impleaded as a party as he is neither a necessary nor proper party to the suit. (Specific Relief Act, 1963 S.19)..........

Showing : 41-50 of 51 Results