Showing : 81-90 of 153 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955-- Item A.20.01 Appendix B - Synthetic vinegar - Word 'Non-fruit' used in label and not 'synthetic' as per provisions of Food Products Order - Cannot be said to have committed any offence under the Act because provisions of Food Products Order overrides the provisions of the Act...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(ix)(g)-- Synthetic vinegar - Marking of label as 'non fruit' instead of 'synthetic' does not amount to misbranding...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Appendix B, Item 25.01 - Hard boiled sugar confectionery - Found to be adulterated in view of presence of mineral oil - Amendment in rules during pendency of appeal - Under amended rules presence of mineral oil permissible - Benefit of amendment not..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Appendix B, Item 25.01 - Report of Public Analyst - Hard boiled sugar confectionery - Found to be adulterated in view of presence of mineral oil - Non mentioning of percentage of mineral oil and fact as to whether mineral oil was of food grade - Mere..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Sentence - Minimum sentence of six month awarded by courts below - Case 24 years old - Minimum sentence upheld - Strict adherence to Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and rules is essential for safe guarding the interest of consumers - Stringent laws will have no meaning if offenders could..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Appendix B, Item 25.01 - Amendment in law - Hard boiled sugar confectionery - Standard of adulteration amended - Whether will be prospective or retrospective in nature - Penal statute which create new offences is always prospective and a person can be..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 19(2)-- Vendor can claim protection of section 19(2) only if : (i) he proves that the manufacturer, distributor or dealer from whom he purchased the article was duly licenced to manufacture, distribute and deal with such product; (ii) He must further prove that a written warranty in the prescribed form..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prolonged proceedings - Case pending trial for the last 20 years - Trial a futile exercise - Proceedings quashed...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section S.20, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 22-- Milk - Less quantity of milk alleged to be purchased as a result of which milk sent for chemical analysis less than 250 ml. - Panchas in whose presence milk was purchased not examined - Conviction on basis of sole testimony of Food Inspector, is not sustainable...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 433A-- Conviction under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Accused faced trial for 20 years - Accused may move the Govt. to commute the sentence - Govt. to decide question of commutation in light of decision of Supreme Court in N.Sukumaran's case...........

Showing : 81-90 of 153 Results