LawMirror.com

Results of panchayat land

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 231-240 of 511 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7, 11, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 136 -- Ejectment from unauthorised possession - Limitation for execution of order - Ejectment order passed against respondents in 1971 - Order not challenged, attained finality - Execution filed, warrants of possession issued - Respondents filed civil suit - Status Quo ordered..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, 227 -- Misuse of process of law - Ejectment ordered from unauthorised occupation of Shamlat land - Execuction of the order kept in abeyance due to orders passed by different Forums by virtue of Forum hunting made by the respondents - Forums are not meant to be used or abused but are meant only to get the right, rightfully claimable..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, 227, Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7, 11 -- Respondents in unauthorised occupation of Shamlat land - Ejectment ordered - Question of title decided by the High Court - Land held to be 'Charand' falling within the definition of Shamlat Deh - Warrant of possession issued - Commissioner in appeal directed..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 -- Jurisdiction of Civil Court - Suit filed by the plaintiff-appellant for declaration to the effect that he is owner in possession of the land in dispute - It was also claimed that jamabandi entries reflecting the ownership of the Gram Panchayat were incorrect and liable to be corrected - Court of competent jurisdiction..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 11 - - Collector had come to categoric finding that the land in question was shown as the ownership of the Nagar Panchayat from 1962-63 and that Nagar Panchayat has been in possession of the said land - The mutation sanctioned in favour of Gram Panchayat having not been challenged, the petitioner estopped from..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 7 -- Question of title - Ejectment from area unauthorisedly occupied - Contention that question of title not decided by Courts below as provided under the proviso to Section 7 of the Act - Title claimed on the basis of sale deed - No specific plea in reply filed regarding title - Vendor's title also not clear -..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Punjab Public Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent) Recovery Act, 1973, Section 4, 5, 7, Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 11 -- Ejectment from unauthoritsed possession - Question of title - Gram Panchayat recorded as owner in jamabandi for the year 1991-92 - Ejectment ordered by Collector - Upheld by Commissioner - Petitioner claiming ownership..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

Shamlat land -- Change of user - Gram Panchayat - Power of - Land was not reserved for any particular purpose in consolidation proceedings - Gram Panchayat as owner is competent to use the same in the best possible manner - Petitioner cannot insist that the land must be leased for cultivation purpose and cannot be given to Forest Department for plantation of trees...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42 -- Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, Section 11 - Jurisdictio, Director Land Records - Title of land - Adjudication - Director Lands Records held that the pro rata cut, applied to the land in dispute, was excessive and the land did not vest in the Gram Panchayat -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2005
Details

East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948, Section 42 -- Exchange of land - Shamilat deh - Objection to the effect that approval of the Government has not been obtained by Gram Panchayat for exchange of land with the land of respondent Nos.2 and 3 - No agreement with regard to exchange of the land between the Sarpanch of the Gram..........

Showing : 231-240 of 511 Results