LawMirror.com

Results of pay o

Showing : 1871-1880 of 3219 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Service -- Equal pay for equal work - The constitutional scheme postulates equal pay for equal work for those who are equally placed in all respects - Possession of a higher qualification has all along been treated a valid basis for classification of two categories of employees...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Service -- Pay fixation - Respondent not opting for her services to be placed on deputation but for staying in Govt. service as a surplus - Her pay scale determined which was the revised scale of pay and her case was not considered by the Fifth Pay Revision Commission - If a scale of pay in a higher category has been refixed by an expert body keeping in view the..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 33, Rule 1 -- Indigent person - Minor children represented though mother - Minor not liable to pay court fee merely because next friend mother has sufficient means - It is property of minor only which is to be taken into consideration - However, next friend can be direct to submit security in view of O.32.R.2-A CPC...........

***************NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(e) -- Defective machinery - Wheat processing plant - Report of the 'Mistry' of OP as also the joint report of Scientist from CSIR show that the machine had been continuously having problems of breakdown, not working properly - Cannot be said that machine supplied by OP was without defects - All these defects occurred during the..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDGIARH

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Insurance policy -- Medi-claim scheme - Renewal - Delay and latches - Claim denied treating the policy as fresh policy as claim made during first 12 months not payable - Earlier policy expired on 31.10.1998 - Complainant filed proposal form on 20.10.1998 and forwarded the same to insurer for renewal - OPs. 2 and 3 (Banks) working as agent of insurer with respect to..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Car -- Vicarious liability - Vehicle taken to dealer for service - Car was taken by technician of dealer-OP while going for lunch - Car met with an accident - Defence of OP that car taken for test drive not plausible as no evidence produced requiring taking of the new car for test drive - OP is not only liable to make the payment of the repairs of the car but also liable..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Termination of service of employee - Accused No.1 Managing Director of company, accused No.2, and partner of firm, accused No.3 - Complainant proved that accused issued the cheque to meet the liability of the company and firm whose Managing Director/partner he was - Accused failed to prove that he stood..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Service -- Notional promotion from retrospective effect - Arrears of salary - Cannot be granted from retrospective date - Principle of no work no pay follows...........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Insurance claim -- Interest - Insurance company deposited the cheque along with interest and the matter remained pending in execution proceeding - The amount remained with the Bank and it utilized the same - The equity demands that the Insurance Company should pay interest upto the date of payment on the amount - The liability of the Insurance Company has not ceased when..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g) -- Carrier service - The complainant hired the service of the petitioner for a consideration for which receipt was issued but the consignment was not delivered to the consignee - In receipt issued by the petitioner there is no clause limiting the liability of the petitioner - Order passed by the Fora below directing to pay..........

Showing : 1871-1880 of 3219 Results