Showing : 11-20 of 111 Results

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 7(1)-- Explanation (c), Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, S.27 - Application for return of stridhan - Valuation of suit for the purposes of pecuniary jurisdiction - Valuation of suit for return of stridhan has no bearing on jurisdiction - It would be different if the plaintiff is required to mention the values..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 9, 16-- Pecuniary jurisdiction - Valuation of suit - Suit for permanent injunction - Civil Judge having unlimited pecuniary jurisdiction of hearing of case - Valuation of suit therefore, not going to effect pecuniary jurisdiction of Court...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2016
Details
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 22C-- Permanent Lok Adalat - Pecuniary jurisdiction - Permanent Lok Adalat shall not have jurisdiction in matters where value of property in dispute exceeds ten lakh rupees...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2015
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Pecuniary jurisdiction of Court - Can be decided as preliminary issue after recording evidence of parties - Plaint cannot be rejected on this ground - Application rightly dismissed...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 2-- Pleadings - Valuation of suit - Suit for mandatory injunction - There are specific assertions in plaint that even on date of filing of suit it was plaintiffs who were in possession - It cannot be said that plaintiffs were seeking possession of suit property by virtue of making prayer for mandatory..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 14, Rule 2-- Preliminary issue - Three issues viz. (a) issue relating to inherent jurisdiction; (b) limitation; (c) pecuniary jurisdiction tried as preliminary issues - Once the Court came to a conclusion that it does not have pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit, it ought not to have proceeded for..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, 39(3)- - Transfer of decree for execution - Competent Court - Held, transferee Court would be a Court of competent jurisdiction to execute decree even if it had otherwise no jurisdiction to try suit provided subject-matter of suit wherein decree was passed does not exceed pecuniary limits, if any, of its..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 34-- Declaratory suit - Registered sale deeds - Execution of - Proof - Defendant No.1 has admitted her thumb impression on sale deeds - Sale deeds also contain recital with regard to payment of consideration - No threat was given by plaintiffs when defendant No.1 put thumb impression on documents - She..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11-- Rejection of plaint - Maintainability of suit otherwise than on grounds of pecuniary and territorial jurisdiction - Can be gone into only in suit after registering plaint...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, 37, 38, 39, Order 21, Rule 99, 97-- Transfer of execution petition - Ground of pecuniary jurisdiction - Locus standi - Legal heirs of defendant against whom execution petition was filed did not raise any objection with regard to jurisdiction of executing Court - Held, third party cannot raise question with regard to jurisdiction of..........

Showing : 11-20 of 111 Results