Showing : 1661-1670 of 14949 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34-- Test Identification parade (TIP) - Murder - Identity of accused already disclosed to witnesses before TIP - Identity of accused by said witnesses before Court is of no evidentiary value, as it is not fair and reliable - Consequently circumstantial evidence of last seen does not itself necessarily..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 392, 34, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65B(4)-- Murder - Circumstantial evidence - Call details - No evidence on record as to how call details brought on record to connect accused with commission of crime - Moreover, no evidence with regard to call details could be proved unless competent officer of concerned cell phone company came forward to..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302-- Murder - Corpus delicti not found - If it is established that a particular person was intentionally killed in absence of discovery or production of body of murdered person, a conviction can be sustained, as conviction for an offence of murder does not necessarily depend upon corpus delicti being..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 364, 201, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9-- Murder - Test identification parade (TIP) regarding photographs of dead body recovered from tank not conducted - Photographs of deceased cannot be relied upon for want of prior TIP - Doubt is created as to dead body recovered from tank was of deceased - Since corpus delicti was absent and there..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323-- Offence u/s 323 IPC - Five eye witnesses stated that accused dragged the deceased and then deceased was assaulted by means of lathi by two accused - Since corpus delicti of deceased was not found, there is no medical evidence to support oral evidence of any assault on deceased - However, in view..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 229, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 409, 420, 467, 468, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(D)-- Discharge - Bitumen scam - Two charge sheets were submitted first against accused second against petitioners - Allegation against petitioners is short supply of bulk bitumen by supplier - However, allegation against accused in first charge is shortage of bulk bitumen - Shortage of bulk bitumen..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 167(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304B-- Default bail - Offence u/s 304-B IPC - Charge sheet not filed within period of 90 days - 90 days period expired on 04.02.2018 - Application for default bail moved on 05.02.2018 and on the same day charge sheet also filed - Bail granted...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307-- Attempt to murder - Knife blow on stomach - Seat of injury in itself is vital and it cannot be said that intention of accused was not cause death - Conviction upheld - Considering nature of injury and looking to seriousness and magnitude of incident, benefit of probation rightly given...........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Cheating - A-1 and A-2 by accepting inferior quality of goods from A-3 and not deducting proportionate cost of value of goods supplied as per agreement, causing wrongful loss to Railways - Dishonest payment made for inferior quality, well proved by prosecution - In said circumstances, when..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 34-- Illegal gratification - Demand, acceptance and recovery - Mere oral evidence stating that accused had asked for illegal gratification for which trap was set through, in the absence of documentary evidence coupled with ocular testimony, accused cannot be held guilty of either receiving illegal..........

Showing : 1661-1670 of 14949 Results