LawMirror.com

Results of penal code s 397 indian

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 195 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 397 -- Offence u/ss 392, 397 IPC - Recovery of articles - Mere recovery cannot lead to conviction and sentence of accused unless they have been properly identified by witnesses...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 397 -- Offence u/ss 392, 397 IPC - Identification of accused - Victim did not identify accused persons and even other PWs also failed to identify accused - Two-wheeler along with knife was recovered on the confession of accused - However, two wheeler has not even been marked as a material object in the case - There was thus, no..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 394, 397, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25 -- Offence u/ss 394, 397 IPC and S.25 of Arms Act - Recovery of pistol from accused - Nothing on record either in the form of statements of witnesses or even medical report that pistol was ever used - Nothing was recovered from accused as per memo prepared at the time of his personal search - However, in..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2023
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 394, 397, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25 -- Offence u/ss 394, 397 IPC and S.25 of Arms Act - Two witnesses who reached the spot on a tractor did not support prosecution case - Improvement in statement of complainant which makes the case of prosecution doubtful - Material witness who is named in FIR and on whose arrival at the scene of crime..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 392, 397, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439 -- Bail - Offence u/ss 392, 397 IPC - Accused are juveniles and are not stated to be involved in any other case - It is co-accused who was carrying a pistol - Accused have been behind the bars for a substantial period of 1 year - Conclusion of trial is likely to consume time in as not..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, 397 -- Cheating - Quashing of order of framing charge - Prima facie case against petitioner cannot be ruled out considering material on record - Petitioner utterly failed to point out what is causing grave miscarriage of..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 342, 395, 397, 307, 34, 120B, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 25(1)(a) -- Bail - Offence u/ss 342, 395, 397, 307, 34, 120-B IPC and Ss.25, 25(1)(a) Arms Act - Even though antecedents of accused may be one amongst relevant considerations while adjudicating a petition on merits for grant of bail,..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 395, 397, 342, 412, 506 -- Discharge - Rape - Robbery - Medical evidence on record shows that there is no external or internal injury found on the person of victim or on her private parts - Witnesses of alleged kidnapping who were produced by police as eye witnesses have not named accused -..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 397, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 24 -- Murder - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Extra judicial confession - Accused gave extra judicial confession before PW6 - However, trial Court rejected said extra judicial confession on the ground that complainant had seen the accused in police station one day prior to said confession - Case of..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2022
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 397 -- Murder - Robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Recovery of gold jewels of deceased from house of accused - Evidence of recovery witness was disbelieved by trial court by giving cogent reasons - Even according to recovery witness accused were with him on the date of incident and therefore recovery is vitiated - Accused rightly..........

Showing : 1-10 of 195 Results