LawMirror.com

Results of permanent injunction restraining

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 71-80 of 225 Results

PATNA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 5, 34, 38 -- Suit for declaration of title, recovery of possession and permanent injunction - Declaration sought that defendant has no right to close windows in wall of house of plaintiff and a direction to remove construction made over suit land and permanent injunction restraining defendants from making any construction - Defendant by..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38 -- Suit for permanent injunction restraining defendants from demolishing latrines and stores of plaintiff - Not part of the house of plaintiff but situated across the street - Public street in between their houses and disputed stores and latrines - In the garb of suit, plaintiff want to perpetuate their illegal occupation on the..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37 -- Permanent injunction - Plaintiff alleged that he is owner in possession of suit property - He sought permanent injunction restraining defendants from demolishing shops as they have no concern with suit property - Defendants resisted suit on ground that suit land had been acquired - However, evidence on record shows that disputed..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37 -- Permanent injunction - Grant of - Excess share than their share, from holdings of other co-sharer, transferred by defendants in favour of subsequent purchaser - Statement of Patwari based on Revenue Record clearly establishes that excess land was transferred - Held, subsequent purchaser cannot said to be a bona fide purchaser -..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1 - - Bar of suit U.O.2.R.2 - Suit for permanent injunction, restraining defendants from alienating suit property to any third parties, reserving her right to file suit for specific performance - Held, plaintiff does not have such power to..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 158 -- Brick earth - Jurisdiction of civil court - Declaratory suit with consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining appellant-State from assessing, levying or recovering royalty on brick earth - Maintainability - Held, once notice has been found to be beyond the four corners of the Land Revenue Act then suit would be..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38 -- Permanent injunction - Restraining defendants from cutting and removing trees standing in their land - Standing trees belong to the owner of the land and not to the person by whom these were planted - Trees planted by any person/lessee/tenant belong to landowner on whose land these were planted and not the planters of the trees..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 20, Order 7, Rule 11, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 134(2), Copyright Act, 1957, Section 62 -- Appellant filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining respondent from infringement of trade mark, copy right, rendition of accounts etc. against respondent at Amritsar - Application filed by respondent U.O.7.R. 11 CPC which was allowed..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 18, 30 -- Plaintiff sought permanent injunction against the defendants not to receive the compensation of the acquired land in dispute, which is to be paid by the Collector - Held, no injunction can be granted to restrain the defendant from instituting or prosecuting their statutory proceedings as it would amount to restraining the..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1, Rule 9 -- Non-joinder of necessary party - State and Right holders (tikadars) - Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction, restraining defendants from causing any interference in their possession - Other tikadars are not interfering in possession of plaintiff - No relief has been claimed against the State - No allegation that anybody..........

Showing : 71-80 of 225 Results