Showing : 51-60 of 162 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Personal necessity - Pleadings - Held, there is no proposition in law that there could be permission granted to landlord to plead for his personal necessity even without any pleadings - Strict rules of evidence may not be essential in rent control matters - If landlord spelt out his..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Rent and Eviction -- Expeditious disposal - Petitioner/landlord a war widow aged 73 years - Ejectment sought on ground of personal necessity - Directions issued to Rent Controller to expedite proceedings and conclude ejectment petition within nine months...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13-- Eviction - Bona fide need - Subsequent events - Landlady aged 77-78 years sought eviction on ground of her personal necessity - She was residing with her son for the last 30-45 years in another residential house - She being aged was unable to walk and thus totally dependent upon her son - During..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 18-- Inspection of suit property by Presiding Judge - Power of Court - Held, inspection of suit Property by Presiding Judge - Court is vested with power U.O.18.R.18 CPC to inspect suit property - Power could be exercised only at discretion of Court considering the facts and circumstances of case to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Bona fide necessity - Landlord has only a room being used as residence in addition to kitchen and bathroom - Besides landlord and his wife, they have two sons and two daughters (third daughter being married) and one of the sons is also married having two issues - There are 9 members in..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13B, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Eviction petition - On ground of personal necessity - Death of NRI landlord during pendency of petition - Dependent wife seeking amendment of eviction petition that even after death of her husband she requires the premises for business and residence - Even in the absence of pleading, requirement..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13, 15, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of written statement - Landlord has sought ejectment of tenant on ground of personal necessity of demised premises - Tenant by way of amendment wants to raise several preliminary objections which were available to him even at the time of filing of original written statement but amendment..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13, 15, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of written statement - Ejectment petition is stated to have been filed in August, 2008 on the ground of personal necessity - Amendment application was moved in November, 2011 i.e. after three years three months - Held, amendment application filed to delay disposal of ejectment petition -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973, Section 13-- Eviction - Bona fide requirement - Ejectment petition filed five years ago - Contention of petitioner/tenant that respondent No.1/landlord has since started practice as advocate and, therefore, ejectment of tenant from demised shop on ground of bonafide requirement of landlord for running..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Eviction - Personal necessity - Pleadings as to - Landlord specifically pleaded that he is not in possession of any other commercial site in urban area of Ferozepur Cantt and he has no other shop - Held, pleadings lead to conclusion that there was no occasion for him to vacate any other shop in..........

Showing : 51-60 of 162 Results