Showing : 2191-2200 of 5787 Results

ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 2(q)-- Complaint - Female relatives of husband - Petition is maintainable - Legislature never intended to exclude female relatives of husband or male partner from the ambit of a complaint that can be made under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act, 2005...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Railways Act, 1989, Section 124, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 34, Interest Act, 1978, Section 3-- Compensation - Interest - Grant of - Held, interest can be directed to be paid from the date of claim petition - Interest awarded is not to be made merely as a default clause but it is to be granted as part of legitimate entitlement of claimants - Payment of interest is basically compensation for..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Section 25B, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 37, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5-- Eviction proceedings - Bona fide need - Leave to defend - Condonation of delay - Recalling of order - Held, S.25B of DRCA which provides for summary trial of applications for eviction on ground of bona fide requirement is a code in itself - Rent Controller while dealing with an application for..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 23, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226-- Writ petition under Art.226 COI is not maintainable against order passed by National Commission - Once legislature has provided for statutory appeal to higher Court, it cannot be proper exercise of jurisdiction to permit parties to bypass statutory appeal to higher Court...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226-- Writ petition - No, Impleadment of parties - Effect of - All affected candidates not made parties to writ petition - Admissions given to them subject to outcome of petition pending before Court - Held, no, impleadment of few of those candidates in these proceedings would not affect legitimate..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Urban Estates (Development and Regulations) Act, 1964, Section 11(3), Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995, Section 45(8), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5- - Cancellation of plot - Appeal against order cancelling allotment of plot filed after 6 years - Limitation to file appeal is 30 days - Petitioner failed to give any reasonable and satisfactory explanation of delay of 6 years in filing of appeal - Held, no relief can be granted to petitioner -..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Prosecution of MD - Quashing of proceedings - At the time of presentation of cheque petitioner was Managing Director of accused No.1-Corporation - Held, petitioner is prima facie answerable to claim - At this stage, it is not permissible for petitioner to..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6-- Proviso - Plaint - Amendment - Sought after commencement of trial - It cannot be said that plaintiff could not seek proposed amendment of plaint before commencement of trial even if plaintiff had exercised due diligence - Held, proposed amendment cannot be allowed in view of proviso to O.6.R.17..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Service -- Respondent appointed lecturer - Not allowed to discharge his duties as Governing Body of College tried to accommodate appellant in his place - Respondent filed appeal against it - Appeal disposed of by Director by ex-parte order - Ex-parte order set aside - Writ petition thereagainst by respondent..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, Section 15-- Appointment of Lambardar - Validity - Because of delay on part of petitioner, process of appointment was delayed and commenced after 15 years - Collector appointed respondent No.4 as Lambardar being more educated and younger in age - Petitioner could act as Sarbrah Lambardar only due to delay..........

Showing : 2191-2200 of 5787 Results