LawMirror.com

Results of prevention of corruption act

Showing : 871-880 of 1466 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Demand of Rs.700/- by Patwari for correction of entries in revenue record - Recovery of tainted money lying underneath a thick cloth which place was pointed out by complainant - Recovery not effected from person of accused - Accused not caught red handed - Demand and acceptance not proved -..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 7, Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 4 -- Probation - Conviction u/ss 7 & 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act - Accused 70 years and not keeping good health - Accused also suffered mental agony of protracted trial for more than 14 years - Held, accused entitled to concession of probation...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13 -- First accused Sub Inspector of Police demanded bribe from complainant and directed him to handover bribe money to second accused, Head Constable - Complainant tendered tainted currency notes to second accused who put it in his pocket, though there was no specific demand by him - Tainted money remained in the pocket of..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d) -- Illegal gratification - Accused acquitted as (1) There is no independent witness to the demand of illegal gratification; (2) Trap witnesses are most interested witnesses therefore some independent evidence ought to have been made on the part of the raiding party - In the absence of independent witness, prosecution..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e), 13(2), 19, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197 -- Illegal gratification - Sanction for prosecution - Refused twice - Accused retired - Charge sheet filed after retirement of accused as sanction of authority was not required after retirement of accused - Held, initiation of proceedings not justified - Proceedings..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(a)(ii), 7 -- Illegal gratification - Recovery of tainted currency notes - Shadow witness not examined - No reason assigned for his non examination - Demand was made in presence of shadow witness - Bribe money was paid in his presence - Members of raiding party swung into action on signal by shadow witness - It was the shadow..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 20(1) -- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Complainant turned hostile - Complainant admitted signatures on complaint - Independent witness and investigating officer proved the demand by proving complaint given by the complainant in their presence - Tainted currency notes recovered from the accused - Held, when..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7 -- Illegal gratification - Recovery of tainted currency notes from the accused - Defence of accused that he and complainant shook hands when he met him and immediately thereafter the trap party arrived and if thereafter phenolphthalein powder test was conducted, certainly the result will be positive - Such defence put to..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19 -- Illegal gratification - Sanction for prosecution - Examination of sanctioning authority not necessary - Sanction order is a public document and its mere production tantamounts to its proof...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12 -- Corruption case - Allegations that accused offered bribe of Rs.2, 000/- to the DSP to hush up the matter - Accused convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year - Accused faced protracted trial for 14 years - Sentence reduced to already undergone...........

Showing : 871-880 of 1466 Results