LawMirror.com

Results of prevention of corruption 7 13

Showing : 231-240 of 467 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19, 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) -- Offence u/ss 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act - Sanction for prosecution - Sanction granted just by signing a draft for sanction - Sanction vitiated for non application of mind - However, competent authority can consider the matter afresh...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 20 -- Illegal gratification - Conviction - Validity - PWs.1 and 2 did not totally depart from basic version of prosecution - They in fact supported basic version of prosecution - If their evidence and that of PW5 is considered in its entirety it is to the effect that appellant demanded bribe of Rs.5000/- from PW1 for..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(i)(d), 20 -- Illegal gratification - Presumption - Where both the complainant and shadow witness have turned hostile, the primary facts had not been proved with regard to demand and acceptance - Mere recovery of signed tainted notes cannot lead to raising of presumption u/s 20 of Act - Conviction and sentence set aside -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(i)(d), 20 -- Illegal gratification - Recovery of tainted money - Tainted money not smeared with phenolphthalein powder - It will create a doubt in prosecution story - No explanation why Vigilance Bureau not involved in raid - No offer of personal search to accused was given by police officials before search - Further the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - In the absence of demand and acceptance, accused is entitled to benefit of doubt...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Demand made over mobile phone - Call details not summoned - No material evidence for demand of bribe - Accused acquitted...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1), 13(2) -- Illegal gratification - Acquittal u/s 7 of the Act - Offence u/s 13(1)(a) not included in the charge - Held, conviction u/s 13(2) cannot be sustained...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)((d), (2) -- Illegal gratification - Tainted currency notes recovered from tray under table - Possible for decoy to have planted currency notes - Non removal of currency notes by accused immediately indicates his innocence - No corroboration of demand - Presence of phenolphthalein in wash of hands of accused loses its..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Illegal gratification - Quashing of FIR - Doctor - Demand for operation and for better treatment - Tainted money recovered from accused - FIR cannot be quashed on the basis of affidavit of witnesses that no demand was made when on the basis of contents of FIR and..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d) -- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance has to be proved - In case prosecution case is found doubtful or not genuine regarding proof of demand and if money was accepted by reason other than the motive or reward, mere recovery from the accused by itself would not prove the offence - Accused can take..........

Showing : 231-240 of 467 Results