LawMirror.com

Results of prevention

Showing : 121-130 of 3247 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(d) -- Offence u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and S.13(2), 13(1)(d) PC Act - No evidence on record to prove that for the work done separate payment was made - Even, videography was got done but said videography was not proved on record, which causes..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 167(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 153A, 120B, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, Section 16, 18, 43D(2)(b) - - Offence u/ss 302, 153-A, 120-B IPC and Ss.16, 18 of 1967 Act - Specific reason assigned by Public prosecutor fulfilling the mandate and requirement of S.43-D(2)(b) of 1967 Act and said fact was considered..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34, 307, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(x) - - Murder - Dispute as to identity of A-2 - Contradiction in the case of prosecution and sentence adduced in Court as to who fired gun shots - Recovery of weapons from accused is also not proved by..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 228 -- Offence u/ss 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and S.120-B IPC - Prima facie after pursuing challan papers and study of evidence collected during investigation, trial Court committed no error in framing charge for..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d) -- Offence u/s 13(1)(d) of the Act - Even if action of authorities concerned is contrary to departmental norms, still it would not justify criminal prosecution, unless it is actuated by dishonest intention to obtain undue pecuniary advantage as dishonest intention is gist of the offence u/s 13(1)(d) of the Act...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13, Delhi Technology University Act, 2009, Section 13(4) - - Appointment - Relaxation of qualification - Cognizance of offence - Relaxation of qualification granted in terms applicable rules and regulations and on the recommendations made by Screening Committee as well as Selection Committee - Even, closure report reveals that..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(x) -- Offence u/s 3(1)(x) of the Act - Where material evidence that alleged utterances were made in public view are absent, offence u/s 3(1)(x) of the Act not made out...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(x) -- Offence u/s 3(1)(x) of the Act - Averment made in FIR itself is not supported by any material in respect of alleged knowledge to accused that complainant belonged to a Schedule Caste - Fact that matrimonial case of accused party is dealt with by complainant/Protection officer not..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d)(i)(ii), 20 -- Illegal gratification - Presumption - Accused serving as clerk in vacancy section of District Employment Exchange office allegedly demanded Rs.200 to issue call letter for job to complainant - PW1 stated that complainant gave money to accused who kept the same in his shirt pocket - However,..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e) -- Cheating - Assets disproportionate to known source of income - Prosecution case is silent about property which accused had possessed before check period and property which accused had purchased during check period - I.O had nowhere stated as to what was income..........

Showing : 121-130 of 3247 Results