Showing : 101-110 of 429 Results

DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16,7,13(2)-- by itself not a ground to throw out prosecution case. - Violation of time limit given in ,R. 7(3) - Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules 1955, R. 7(3)..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955-- is only directory and not mandatory...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1955-- Use of permitted synthetic food colours in peas kept in open containers - Not permitted - In other words the same is prohibited...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 13, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 22, 22B-..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Second sample for analysis - Delay - Sample taken in the year 1993 - Sample not produced in Court for a period of almost three years after filing of application u/s 13(2) of the Act - Second sample could not be sent for analysis to CFL till 2004 - Delay in sending second sample for analysis to..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Presence of talc (Magnesium Silicate) in Urd whole - Talc not a permitted inorganic matter - Held, presence of talc in food grains regardless of its percentage makes the food article adulterated...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Adulteration - Sample of Dhania found adulterated with few turmeric starches - Only microscopic examination of food article conducted - No chemical test done - Precise nature or content of same also not specified - Held, benefit of doubt has been rightly granted to accused - Acquittal calls for..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 13(2), 16-- Report of public analyst sent in the name of wrong firm - Real owner did not accept the same - Petitioner lost his right to send second sample to CFL as 10 years have passed since sample was taken - Proceedings quashed...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(iv), 23(1), 23(1A)(f), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 44.1-- Universal salt iodisation - Whether Rule 44.1 of the Rules travels beyond the scope of the Act? - The Act cannot be used to make a rule intended to achieve an object wholly unrelated to the Act - The good intention of the rule making authority is not therefore sufficient to save the rule - Rule..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(iv), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 44.1-- Universal salt iodisation - S.7(iv) of the Act is of no assistance to decide upon the validity of Rule 44-I, nor can it be a source of power to make Rule 44-I...........

Showing : 101-110 of 429 Results