Showing : 121-130 of 449 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, 17-- Sale of cow milk without requisite licence - Accused society indulging into storage of milk for purpose of sale - Accused-society merely an agent of Milk Federation, Collects milk from farmers and supplies same to Milk Federation for its further supply to Govt. - Milk Federation holding valid..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 32-- Label on ghee container misbranded as date of manufacture not mentioned - It is breach of Rule 32 - A written warning has to be given for the offender for the first time - In case breach is repeated after the warning, then party committing the offence for the second time should be prosecuted...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rules 17 & 18 - Rules 17 & 18 not complied with - Acquittal of accused is unassailable...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 50, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378-- Sale of adulterated Paneer - Appeal against acquittal - PW1 never stated before Court that seized Paneer was meant for sale to public - Report of Public Analyst showing fat contents to be 40.45% whereas report of C.F.L. shows that fat contents were 47.85% - There is variation of contents of milk..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(4)-- Seizure of premises - Food Inspector has no power to seize the premises - It is only the articles intended for food and suspected as adulterated or misbranded could be seized and not the premises where such articles have been kept - Order regarding seal of premises set aside...........
UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 20A-- Sample of mustard oil found adulterated on analysis - Summoning of manufacturer - No evidence against manufacturer - Summoning order does not reflecting that there was any receipt or invoice or warranty issued by petitioners in favour of person from whom sample was purchased and against wholesale..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 23(1A)(hh), 16(1)(a), 7(1)-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 65(2) (As amended with effect from 17.06.2009) - Sample of Pepsi taken by Food Inspector in the year 2006 - Sample analysed by public analyst using Director General of Health Services Method and gave report that the same was adulterated as it..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 17, 2(1)(a)(h)-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 65(2) - Vicarious liability - Offence by company - Food article manufactured by company found to be adulterated - Prosecution of Directors - Company nominated Officer of the company to be the person in charge of and responsible to the company for..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 17-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 65(2) (As amended) - Vicarious liability - Offence by Company - Prosecution of Directors of Company - It has to be indicated in the complaint itself as to whether the Directors concerned were either in charge of or responsible to the Company for..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(v), 16(a)(i), 20, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 37A-- Pan Masala - Ingredients not shown on the label thus violating Rule 37-A of the Rules - Prosecution for an offence under the PFA Act can only be instituted with the written consent of the Central Government or the State Government or a person authorized in this behalf by general or special order..........

Showing : 121-130 of 449 Results