Showing : 131-140 of 451 Results

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(1)(c)-- Milk - Sample found deficient in fat and sold not fat contents below the prescribed standard - Accused can be convicted in absence of any further report that it was injurious to health...........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 22 - Quantity of 250 ml. milk as sample sent to Public Analyst for analysis - Sample found adulterated - Sample quantity was in accordance with Rule 22 - Amended provisions of rule came into force at later date - Held, conviction cannot be..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 22 - Quantity of 250 ml. milk as sample sent to Public Analyst for analysis - Sample found adulterated - Independent witness turned hostile - Held, evidence of Food Inspector and other official witnesses cannot be discarded merely because..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(1), 2(ia)(a), 2(ia)(m), 16-- Sample of mustard oil - Found adulterated - Complaint against Company and its Directors - No particulars in complaint as regards complicity of any of the Directors in the crime - Held, it cannot be taken that all the Directors of the Company are responsible for commission of crime...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(1), 2(ia)(a), 2(ia)(m), 16, 13(2)-- Sample of mustard oil - Found adulterated - Complaint against Company and its Directors - Delay in sending notice u/s 13(2) of the Act - Held, while considering factor of delay, nature of product has to be taken into consideration...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 50(1)-- Milk - Not for public sale - It was meant for sending to the factory of Hindustan Lever Limited for further manufacturing of milk food items - Held, offence under the Act is not made out inspite of the fact that accused were having license for sale of milk - Summoning order as well as proceedings..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Report of public analyst showed that sample of food articles were adulterated - Copy of report sent to accused - Delay of 10 days on the part of accused in making applications for sending second sample to laboratory - Held, if accused makes an application after expiry of the period and satisfies..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(i), 2(i)(m)-- Food adulteration - Conviction - Reduction in sentence - Sample of food found not in conformity with prescribed standards - Incident took place about 27 years ago - Accused now more than 70 years of age - Suffering from several ailments - Conviction maintained - Sentence reduced to already..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, 13(2)-- Sample of groundnut oil found adulterated - Accused convicted - Report of public analyst not sent to the accused u/s 13(2) of the Act - Held, it deprives the accused of an important safeguard and defense - Accused, in the absence of report cannot move the court for sending other part of the sample..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, 13(2)-- Protracted trial - Conviction - Accused suffered 25 years of protracted trial - Also suffered sentence of near about 5 days - Plea that sentence of one year be reduced to already undergone - Cannot be allowed - High Court has no power to reduce imprisonment less than the minimum period prescribed..........

Showing : 131-140 of 451 Results