Showing : 151-160 of 451 Results

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 216, 217, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Sale of adulterated turmeric powder - Trial proceeded on the allegations that accused No.2 was present in the shop when sample was collected - When the case was mature for pronouncement of judgment, charge amended to the effect that it was accused No.1 who was present in the shop when sample was..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2, 7(2)(2)(5), 11(1)(a)-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.378 - Sale of adulterated chilly powder - Accused acquitted - Prosecution not followed mandatory provisions during the sealing and seizing the sample - Prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14 - Sale of adulterated turmeric powder - No specific evidence that sample bottles were dried and cleaned when sample was drawn - Held, there was a breach of mandatory requirement laid down under Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules -..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Quashing of proceedings - As per petitioner, sample of Parle Bailey Aqua Packed Drinking Water, on account of which complaint was filed, was drawn on 26.12.2002 - Petitioner joined the concern on 24.11.2004 and resigned from service on 13.09.2007 - Contention that under these circumstances..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14 - Cow milk - Sample found with marginal difference - Evidence of Scientific Officer of Public analyst Office that if milk is not properly stirred before collecting the sample, then there may be marginal difference in analysis of the milk and..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(1), 16(1)(A)(1)-- Wheat - Sample found adulterated - Accused convicted and sentenced to six months imprisonment and imposed with fine of Rs.2, 000/- - Adulteration only on account of marginal deficiency in constituents and nothing injurious to health found in sample - Accused facing trial since long - Looking to..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Prosecution not followed mandatory provision of S.13(2) of the Act - Prosecution not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt - Acquittal calls for no interference...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 13(2)-- Second analysis - Shelf life expired by the time report of Public Analyst was served on accused - Accused lost his valuable defence of obtaining second opinion from Central Food Laboratory to prove that report of public analyst is not correct - Accused is entitled for out right acquittal...........
JHARKHAND HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- R.2(iii) - Sample of cold drink - Excess quantity of added sugar found - Relevant rule regarding declaration of quantity of added sugar, came into force on 01-10-2003 - Seized sample was manufactured on 18-06-2003 - Held, accused cannot be prosecuted u/s 16(1)(a) of the Act...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(ix)(b)(h)(k), 32(c)(i), 7(2)(5), 16(1A)(1), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378-- - Sale of adulterated turmeric powder - Acquittal - Validity - Reports of public analyst shows that sample which was produced before analyst found as per standard and it was not found misbranded - Even perusal of documentary evidence, complainant has failed to prove the case beyond reasonable..........

Showing : 151-160 of 451 Results