Showing : 71-80 of 429 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(ia)(ii), 2(v), 2(1)(a)(e)(j), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 29-- Article stored in hotel for preparation of food - Comes within definition of food as defined u/s 2(v) of the Act - Storing adulterated articles for manufacture of food attracts penal provision...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 17, 18-- Report of CFL supersedes the report of Public Analyst - Where different ingredients of the offence are disclosed by the report of CFL then fresh sanction to prosecute is necessary - Moreover no care was taken to explain the discrepancies in the two reports - Acquittal calls for no interference...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2), 7, 16-- Indefeasible statutory right of having second sample of food articles examined by Central Food Laboratory - Effect of delay in examination of sample - Total responsibility for the huge delay which has been occasioned in the examination of the second sample of milk is of the prosecution - A gross..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7,16,13(2)-- Tea - Sample found adulterated - Application u/s 13(2) for second analysis of CFL filed within time - Sample received in Court after twelve years but could not be sent to CFL as prescribed fee not deposited by State - 27 years lapsed since sample was collected and it cannot retain its original..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Second analysis of sample - Accused has a statutory right to challenge the report of the Public Analyst by having the second sample analysed by Central Food Laboratory and that too, before the expiry date or the best before date...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Adulteration - Complaint filed after five years of taking sample - Accused deprived of his statutory right to challenge report of Public Analyst by having second sample of food article analysed by CFL u/s 13(2) of the Act - Proceedings liable to be quashed...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(i)(a)(i), 13(2)-- Milk - Sample from a milk pouch - Milk pouch is required to be kept in hot water for some time so that fat content which sticks to the polythene envelope mixes up in the milk and this process would make the sample homogeneous - Milk fat dissolves at a temperate of 21 degree centigrade - Sample..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(i)(a)(i), 13(2)-- Milk - Adulteration - Food Inspector could have easily associated one or two independent persons to witness the sampling process, which was not done - Case also suffers from this vice...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2), 17(2)-- Tomato Sauce - Sample found adulterated - By the time report of Public Analyst was received by applicant, a period of more than three years had elapsed - Applicant deprived of his valuable right u/s 13(2) of the Act of getting sample analysed by Director, Central Food Laboratory and as such..........

Showing : 71-80 of 429 Results