Showing : 21-30 of 71 Results

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(1)(c)-- Milk - Sample found deficient in fat and sold not fat contents below the prescribed standard - Accused can be convicted in absence of any further report that it was injurious to health...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 50(1)-- Milk - Not for public sale - It was meant for sending to the factory of Hindustan Lever Limited for further manufacturing of milk food items - Held, offence under the Act is not made out inspite of the fact that accused were having license for sale of milk - Summoning order as well as proceedings..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Cow milk - Sample found deficient - Petitioner convicted and sentenced - Petitioner suffered protracted trial for 22 years and remained in jail for about 2 months - No evidence of previous involvement in any offence - Sentence reduced to already undergone - However, fine enhanced from Rs.1000/- to..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14 - Cow milk - Sample found with marginal difference - Evidence of Scientific Officer of Public analyst Office that if milk is not properly stirred before collecting the sample, then there may be marginal difference in analysis of the milk and..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)-- Milk - Sample found adulterated as milk sold not fat was found 7% as against the prescribed standard of 8.5% - Accused convicted and sentenced to minimum prescribed sentence of six months RI - Sentence cannot be reduced when minimum sentence prescribed by statute is awarded...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(ix)(k), 7-- Infant food - Neither marketed nor represented as compliment to mother's milk - Held, it is not infant food as defined under Rule 2(db) - Hence, neither Rule 37-B (1) nor 37-B(2) would apply...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Cow milk - Milk for public sale - Milk fat found below minimum prescribed limit - Accused convicted - Procedure of warrant case adopted at very commencement of case and without giving opportunity of being heard to parties and passed order of conviction - Trial vitiated - Remitting back of case..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Sample of milk - Found adulterated - Report of public analyst at variance with report of Central Food Laboratory - Report of CFL supersedes report of public analyst...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Sample of milk - Found adulterated - Food Inspector asked accused to which animal did the milk belong - Accused expressed ignorance - Non fatty sold found only 6.3% whereas it should be minimum of 9% of Buffalo's milk, 8.5% for cow's milk and 9% for Goat's or sheep's milk, 8.5% for mixed milk -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(7)-- Sample of milk drawn - Efforts made to join independent witnesses - None came forward - Sufficient compliance of Section 10(7) of the Act...........

Showing : 21-30 of 71 Results