Showing : 41-50 of 63 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 9(j) - Milk - Sample found adulterated - Rule 9 is not mandatory but directory - Non compliance of Rule 9 - Accused cannot be acquitted...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Sample found adulterated - Sample taken out of huge quantity of milk and Food Inspector only shook vessel containing milk - This is not stirring or churning of milk - Sample taken not homogeneous or of representative character - Acquittal on said ground, held, proper...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Deviation in milk fat by 0.15% - Report of Director, Central Food Laboratory that it falls within the experimental tolerance and other parameters being well within the specified limits, the same may be deemed to conform to the standard laid down for cow's milk under the PFA Act and Rules..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(i)(a)(i)-- Milk - Sample contained non solid fat of 8.1% instead of 8.5% and contained solid fat at 4.5% instead of 4% - Acquittal by High Court by giving benefit by assuming that possibility of improper stirring could not be ruled out - Order of High Court set aside - It was factually found by lower Courts..........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section S.20, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 22-- Milk - Less quantity of milk alleged to be purchased as a result of which milk sent for chemical analysis less than 250 ml. - Panchas in whose presence milk was purchased not examined - Conviction on basis of sole testimony of Food Inspector, is not sustainable...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Contained fat more than required standard but there was small deficiency in milk solids not fat - Accused undergoing agony of trial for 20 years - It is sufficient punishment - Accused acquitted...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Sample found to be adulterated - Complaint did not state that milk was shaken up clock-wise and anti clock-wise to make it homogeneous - This lacuna cannot be filled up by Food Inspector during his examination - Acquittal upheld...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Boiled milk - Sample taken by mixing milk with cup - Fat which came on the top of boiled milk cannot be remixed with a cup - Acquittal upheld...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(2), 16(1)(a)(i), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 9(f)-- Milk intended to be sold as such - Failure of Food Inspector to enquire and satisfy himself - Version of accused that the milk was not to be sold as such has to be accepted - If on enquiry vendor does not make necessary disclosures or pleads ignorance only then question of presumption under Note I..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(2)-- Boiled milk - Kept in kitchen of a hotel intended to be used to make other articles of food - Found to be below standard - As milk was not intended for sale as a primary food no offence is committed...........

Showing : 41-50 of 63 Results