Showing : 41-50 of 71 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(1)-- Adulteration - Cow's milk - Deficiency in milk solids and not fat - It cannot be said that milk is adulterated - Only inference that can be drawn is that either sample was not properly taken or analysed or that cow was not properly fed - Petitioner acquitted...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(1)-- Sample of milk found 5% deficit in milk solids - Factum of stirring is to be mentioned in the complaint - Statement in Court to this effect is only an improvement - Accused acquitted...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(1)-- Milk - Homogeneous - Drum having capacity of 45 litres and having milk to its full capacity - Milk stirred with a milk measure of 6 inches - Milk could not be made homogeneous as is required to be done before taking sample - Petitioner acquitted...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Cow milk - Fat of 4.7% against prescribed standard of 3.5% - Non solid fat found to be 8.04% as against prescribed standard of 8.5% - Fat content being more and non fat content being only slightly less, no error in order of acquittal...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2007
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 433(d), Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16, 7(1)-- Khoya - Sample contained 19.07% of milk fat against 20% - Accused convicted and sentenced to 6 months imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- - Accused in custody for more than three months - Fine increased to Rs.7500/- - Accused to move appropriate Government for commutation of the custodial..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Sample found adulterated - Conviction on the basis of report of Public Analyst - Report of CFL not taken into consideration as not proved or formally tendered in evidence - Report signed by Director CFL can be used as evidence without formally getting it proved and/or formally admitting the..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Milk - Sample found adulterated - Public Analyst Report - Report of public analyst received after filing of complaint within time - Prayer for sending second sample was to be made immediately - But application moved after delay of 10 months - After delay of 10 months sample of milk cannot be sent..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 9(j) - Milk - Sample found adulterated - Rule 9 is not mandatory but directory - Non compliance of Rule 9 - Accused cannot be acquitted...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Sample found adulterated - Sample taken out of huge quantity of milk and Food Inspector only shook vessel containing milk - This is not stirring or churning of milk - Sample taken not homogeneous or of representative character - Acquittal on said ground, held, proper...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Deviation in milk fat by 0.15% - Report of Director, Central Food Laboratory that it falls within the experimental tolerance and other parameters being well within the specified limits, the same may be deemed to conform to the standard laid down for cow's milk under the PFA Act and Rules..........

Showing : 41-50 of 71 Results