Showing : 51-60 of 63 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 9(f)-- It is obligatory for the Food Inspector to make enquiries and only in case vendor refuses to make necessary disclosures, presumption under the Note can be raised - When the vendor was not asked regarding the source of milk, it is wrong to apply the standard prescribed for buffalo milk to the..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14-- Milk - Sample - Prosecution failing to prove that sample was taken in dry bottle or milk was stirred by a clean stick or milk measurement - Violation of Rule 14 - Accused acquitted...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Sample of milk - Deficiency found in milk solids but no deficiency found in milk fat - Cannot be said that milk was not pure - Inference that can be drawn is that the buffalo/cow was not properly fed...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Before taking sample milk stirred and made homogeneous - No evidence that sample was taken after making the milk stirred with clean stick and stirring was in clockwise and anti-clockwise in such a way that milk at the bottom was thoroughly mixed - Conviction set aside...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14-- Milk - Sample - To be drawn in clean and odourless glass bottles - Food inspector admitted that bottles were not cleaned and he had no knowledge when it was cleaned - Violation of mandatory provision of Rule 14 - Accused acquitted...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14-- Milk - Sample - To be drawn in clean and odourless glass bottles - Rule 14 is mandatory - Violation of mandatory provision - Order of acquittal, cannot be said to be in any way perverse or unreasonable or unjustified...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Found to be adulterated - Contention that milk was not for sale but for preparation of tea - Plea not tenable as sale to Food Inspector for analysis amounts to sale within the purview of the Act...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16, 7-- Curd - It will be deemed that it was buffalo's milk in absence of any explanation given by accused...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Appendix B, Entry No.11.02.04, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, R.9 - Curd - Use of Buffalo's milk or cow's milk - Held, it is not the duty of Food Inspector to hold enquiries and give a finding that he had ascertained that the curd was prepared out of the buffalo's milk and not from..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Protracted trial - Reduction of sentence to period already undergone - Sample of cow's milk found adulterated - Conviction and sentence of 2 years RI reduced to one year in appeal - Occurrence of the year 1990 - 18 years had elapsed - Accused has a right of speedy trial under Art.21 of..........

Showing : 51-60 of 63 Results