Showing : 331-340 of 447 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(2)-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance of gratification other than legal remuneration, though for a work, which did not fall within the purview of the discharge of his duties, still the offence, punishable under the Act is constituted...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(2)-- Illegal gratification - Mere fact that the criminal proceedings lingered on for about 21 years, in itself, could not be said to be a sufficient ground, to reduce the sentence, awarded to the accused...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Accused while working as an accountant demanded Rs.1, 000/- from complainant to hand over the draft of Rs.1.2 Lakhs - Raid conducted and tainted currency notes recovered - Evidence showed that the draft was already handed over to the complainant two days earlier to raid -..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d), 19-- Additional accused - Illegal gratification - Petitioner cannot be summoned as an additional accused against whom sanction for prosecution was earlier not granted...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Accused while working as an accountant demanded Rs.1, 000/- from complainant to hand over draft of Rs.1.2 Lakhs - Accused allegedly himself surrendered the currency notes which were tainted during trap - Held, this evidence leaves no room for doubt that the alleged tainted..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B-- Third bail application - Offence u/ss 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act and S.120-B IPC - Accused in custody for last ten months - Bail granted without expressing opinion on merits...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d)(ii)-- Illegal gratification - If an independent witness, joined with the raiding party does not support the case of prosecution and turns hostile, Court can rely upon the other evidence, produced by the prosecution, and if the same is reliable, accused can be convicted...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), 20-- Illegal gratification - Acquittal by trial Court - Conviction by High Court - Recovery proved - Burden of rebuttal shifted upon accused who failed to rebut the same - Plea that it was not bribe but it was repayment of loan - Number of notes matched with the numbers noted in the ACB - Bushirt..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), 7, 11-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Acceptance of part of demanded amount proved - Entire prosecution case does not fail when case relation to trap, recovery of money and chemical test by prosecution is established...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B-- Mere recovery of tainted money by itself cannot prove the charge of prosecution against the accused in the absence of any evidence to prove payment of bribe or to show that accused voluntarily accepted the money knowing it to be bribe...........

Showing : 331-340 of 447 Results