Showing : 351-360 of 441 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2) r, w, 13(1)(d), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(2), 5(1)(d), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471A-- Offence of forgery and cheating by company by taking loan on forging documents as to its financial status - Compromise between parties - Criminal proceedings quashed though offence except offence u/s 420 IPC is not compoundable - Held, technicality should not be allowed to stand in the way in the..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 20-- Illegal gratification - Receiving of money - Presumption as to - Rebuttal of - Accused had stated that money was planted in the file - Version of accused that money planted in the file is not supported by any material - On other hand, case of prosecution that money was given to accused and it was..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Demand of Rs.250/- by Patwari for supplying copy of revenue record - Complainant and shadow witness turned hostile - Police Officer who conducted raid did not offer himself for search - Discrepancies in prosecution version with regard to recovery - Demand not proved by..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Two accused named in FIR - Police filing report against one accused only - Magistrate summoning one accused only against whom final report u/s 173 Cr.P.C. is filed - Magistrate must give notice to the informant and provide him an opportunity to be heard at the time of consideration of the report..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19, 13(1)(d), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420-- Sanction for prosecution refused by competent authority twice - On request of police, concerned authority reviewed the order and granted sanction on same material - Order granting sanction set aside - Held, once the sanction was refused it was not open to the competent authority to review the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 389, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Conviction u/ss 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) Prevention of Corruption Act - Suspension of sentence - Appellate Court is required to record reasons in writing for ordering suspension of execution of sentence or order appealed - Reasons not indicated while directing suspension of sentence - Order set aside...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(c)-- Accused No.3 Vice President of CANFINA dealing with CANCIGO units - Allegation against him that he accepted CANCIGO units though they stood in the name of Andhra Bank and Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd. - They were accepted with the proper authorisation by the higher authorities in CANFINA -..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Independent witness stating that all the writing work after raid was carried out at the office of the Anti Corruption Branch and even the diary from where the tainted money was recovered sealed there and not at the spot and tainted currency notes were not sealed at all -..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Independent witness associated in three traps - Not an independent witness...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Tainted money recovered from inside a diary - Defence plea that accused went to fetch glass of water asked for by complainant and in his absence complaint put currency notes in diary - Defence appeared probable when complainant admitted that he had desired to have water -..........

Showing : 351-360 of 441 Results