Showing : 1-10 of 1419 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 17-- Person authorized to investigate - Authorization in favour of DSP was issued by Joint Director of Anti-Corruption Bureau, when he was performing his duties in public interest and not for his own benefit - Such authorization is valid and binding as it was an act of an officer de jure - Final report..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(e)-- Assets disproportionate to known source of income - Quashing of FIR - Preliminary inquiry not taken - Relevant information was available with informant in respect of prima facie allegations disclosing a cognizable offence - Once officer recording FIR is satisfied with such disclosure, he can..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Quashing of FIR - Lack of sanction for prosecution - Question whether sanction is necessary to prosecute a retired public servant, is a question which can be examined during course of trial...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Sanction for prosecution u/s 19 of the Act - Retirement from service - Sanction for prosecution u/s 19 of the Act is not required...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 17-- Illegal gratification - Investigation by a police officer not of the rank of DSP or equal - Lapse only an irregularity - Unless irregularity results in causing prejudice, conviction will not be vitiated and bad in law...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Illegal gratification - Sanction for prosecution - A mere error, omission or irregularity in sanction is not considered to be fatal unless it has resulted in a failure of justice or has been occasioned thereby - S.19(1) of the Act is matter of procedure and does not go to root of jurisdiction and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Illegal gratification - Sanction for prosecution - PW1 issued and granted sanction for prosecution of accused - Accused was working as an inspector in DESU and PW1 was competent officer to remove him - PW1 after carefully examining allegations contained in material placed before him, granted..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13-- Illegal gratification - Accused being inspector in DESU demanded Rs.2000 for supply of electricity to PW2 - Currency notes were given to accused in a polythene bag - Presence of PW3, panch witness on the spot remains unchallenged - PW2, PW3 and PW5 (inspector) affirmed that accused produced..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(D), 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, 0- - Offence u/ss 420, 120-B IPC and Ss.13(1)(D), 13(2) of P.C. Act - FIR was registered as back as in the year 2012 and since then investigation is going on - Petitioner retired from service in the meantime - No case for quashing of FIR is made out - However, in the interest of justice it is ordered..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 471, 477A, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Cheating - Conspiracy - A-1 with connivance of deceased sanctioned loan in violating rules and regulations for their personal gains in order to cheat bank - There is sufficient evidence on record against A-1 - However, no evidence on record against other two accused - Prosecution thus, failed to..........

Showing : 1-10 of 1419 Results