Showing : 91-100 of 1396 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(C)-- Bail - Illegal gratification and rape - Petitioner Superintendent of Police against whom there is allegation of taking bribe and commission of rape - Evidence of complainant/material witnesses including their cross-examination completed - There is thus, no point in continuing the detention of..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d).13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Tape recorded conversation - Conversation of demand of Rs.7500 allegedly recorded in Tape recorder - However, there is discrepancy about time of handing over possession of tape recorder along with fact that voice and conversation which was transcribed has not been proved..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d).13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Accused being Industrial Inspector allegedly demanded Rs.7500 from complainant in order to avail loan for auto rickshaw - Complainant himself admitted that accused never demanded money from him - Accused only agreed to help complainant to pass on..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 319, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 11, 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 409, 120B-- Summoning of additional accused - Misappropriation of amount in State Corporation - Collection of money done in different branch offices spread all over State - However, instructions were being parted through a Managing Director and Chairman of Corporation - Proposed accused/respondents are PA to..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Sanction for prosecution - Provisions of S.19 of P.C.Act will have an overriding effect over general provisions contained in S.190 or S.390 Cr.P.C. - Special Judge while trying an offence under P.C Act cannot summon another person and proceed against him in purported exercise of power u/s 319..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Demand of bribe from complainant for issuing notice to Sarpanch - As per evidence on record, there is inconsistent testimony of complainant as to time to visit to office of Collector for making inquiry with accused - Even, inconsistent testimonies of complainant and panch..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Offence u/ss 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Act - Accused allegedly committed irregularities in construction of wells undertaken in Jeevandhara Scheme and made payments fraudulently to beneficiaries without well being constructed - However, record reveals that third instalment which was to accrue on..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 109-- Offence u/s 13 of P.C. Act against public servant and u/s 109 IPC against non public servant - All accused discharged - During pendency of revision, main accused died - Revision dismissed by holding that death of main accused has resulted in abatement of trial - Held, death of main accused does..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e), 13(2), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 101, 102-- Criminal misconduct - Assets disproportionate to known source of income - Burden of proof - Primary burden to bring home charge of criminal misconduct is on prosecution - It is only on discharge of such burden by prosecution, if accused failed to satisfactorily account for the same, he will be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e), 13(2)-- Criminal misconduct - Assets disproportionate to known source of income - Prosecution failed to prove beyond all reasonable doubt the charge of criminal misconduct - Accused not required in law to offer any explanation to satisfactorily account therefor - Benefit of doubt given to accused -..........

Showing : 91-100 of 1396 Results