Showing : 91-100 of 1356 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 228, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 201, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2)-- Framing of charge - Cheating and forgery - Allegation that accused should have retired a year back but still serving and there is difference in his date of birth as far as service book and certificate concerned - Entry in service book made on basis of matric certificate - No over-writing/cutting..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 321, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 468, 471, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2)-- Withdrawal from prosecution - Cheating - Forgery - Tampering of mark sheet - Alleged forged mark sheet not recovered by prosecution - Even respondent no.2 in whose favour alleged mark sheet is forged had not taken any benefit out of said mark sheet - Offence of cheating or forgery not proved on..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), 12, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance of Rs.800 from complainant - Vital ingredients i.e demand, acceptance and recovery are proved from the evidence of PW1 and PW2, which is in conformity with each other and getting due corroboration from contemporaneous panchnama and evidence of other..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2), 12, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 161-- Illegal gratification - Reduction of sentence - Trap was laid for about 24 years back - During interregnum period accused have suffered a lot by way of facing departmental proceedings and have superannuated by now - Sentence of accused reduced from 2 years R.I to 1 year R.I...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Recovery of currency notes becomes meaningless when complainant himself disowned the complaint and admitted that whatever amount was given by him to accused was towards the settled amount of compensation to the victim - Demand and acceptance not..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13-- Illegal gratification - Complainant himself not supported the prosecution case and he disowned the complaint itself except identifying his signature - Evidence of shadow witness also not out of doubt as in his evidence, several contradictions were found - Vital ingredients like demand and..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Complainant supporting prosecution case in examination-in-chief - However, in cross examination clearly and categorically admitted that accused had never demanded any amount of illegal gratification and that accused never accepted any amount from him and that he had not..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19, 7, 13, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 120B-- Sanction for prosecution - Offence u/ss 7, 13 of P.C.Act and Ss.420, 120-B IPC - Competent authority while passing sanctioning order specifically mentioned offences in question - Merely wrong mentioning of S.197 Cr.P.C. instead of S.19 of P.C.Act, does not cause any prejudice or failure of justice..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Sanction for prosecution - Defective sanction, unproved sanction or sanction on no, application of mind are all fatal to prosecution case under the Act...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19, 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Sanction for prosecution - Offence u/ss 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of the Act - Sanction granted by PW9, who is merely a Desk officer and not the appointing authority, - PW9 merely signed the sanction on behalf of President of India without having any authority - Prosecution miserably failed to prove the..........

Showing : 91-100 of 1356 Results