Showing : 31-40 of 1356 Results

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Sanction for prosecution - Sanctioning authority while declining to grant sanction in its earlier order omitted to consider relevant fact - Said order was reviewed and sanctioning authority granted sanction, as prima facie case for grant of sanction for prosecution found - No jurisdictional error..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Sanction for prosecution - After registration of complaint and pending investigation accused was placed under suspension - After departmental enquiry major penalty of dismissal from service was passed - On the date of filing charge sheet and taking cognizance accused was not a public servant -..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 468-- Misconduct - Pecuniary advantage - Abusing official position - Accused cheated complainant and his brother by dishonestly inducting them to pay money for handing over possession of shop - Possession of shop was with accused due to his official position in Revenue Section - Accused having full..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 4, 3-- Jurisdiction of Special Judge - Presiding officer decided the case after publishing the notification issued by Government - Judgment passed by Special Judge is perfectly in order - Presiding Officer is undoubtedly Special Judge competent to try case under the Act, the date on which judgment was..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 228, 397(2), 482, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 22(d), Constitution of India, 1950, Article 227-- Charge - Order framing charge - Challenge thereto - Stay of proceedings - Wherever stay is granted, a speaking order must be passed showing that the case was of exceptional nature and delay on account of stay will not prejudice the interest of speedy trial in a corruption case - Once stay is..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 8, 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Bail - Offence u/ss 420, 120-B IPC and Ss.8, 13(2), 13(1)(d) PC Act - Accused committed offence u/s 8 of PC Act which is punishable with imprisonment for term which may extend to 5 years with fine, in such cases bail should not be refused unless crime charged is of highest magnitude and punishment..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d), 20, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, 65B-- Illegal gratification - Tape recorded conversation - Conversation between complainant and accused - Voice sample kept in sealed cover sent for FSL examination - FSL report proved the voice in conversation and voice in respect of samples to be of same person - Call details record was produced in..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d), 20-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Clinching evidence on record against accused regarding demand of bribe and factum of receiving bribe by accused - Tainted money recovered from accused - Phenolphthalein test was positive - PWs categorically stated the incident - Tape recorded..........
PATNA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 229, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 409, 420, 467, 468, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(D)-- Discharge - Bitumen scam - Two charge sheets were submitted first against accused second against petitioners - Allegation against petitioners is short supply of bulk bitumen by supplier - However, allegation against accused in first charge is shortage of bulk bitumen - Shortage of bulk bitumen..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Sanction for prosecution - Sanction order indicates that Railway Board being competent authority has taken collective decision to accord sanction after fully and carefully going through statements and documents - Mere irregularity in granting sanction for prosecuting A-1, does not fall within..........

Showing : 31-40 of 1356 Results