Showing : 1-10 of 1380 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 19-- Discharge - Sanction for prosecution - Issue relating to invalidity of sanction for prosecution is to be raised during trial and not at the stage of considering discharge application...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e), 13(2)-- Assets disproportionate to known source of income - Discharge - High Court allowed discharge application of A-2 and dismissed the discharge application of A-1 by not adverting to fact that charge made against A-2 is also of abetting commission of offence by A-1 - Neither any reasons recorded nor..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 304B, 201, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Cheating - Opening of fictitious account in Bank without proper verification in accordance with banking regulations and deposits in the same and withdrawals by bank employees - CFSL Officer deposed that account opening form of fictitious account was in the handwriting of accused `P' impersonating..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 389, 437, 439, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 473, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Bail during pendency of appeal - Active involvement of accused in the offence - Keeping in view the magnitude of the offence, bail during pendency of appeal declined...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Offence u/ss 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and S.13(2), 13(1)(d) PC Act - No evidence on record to prove that for the work done separate payment was made - Even, videography was got done but said videography was not proved on record, which causes serious dent in the prosecution case - Moreover,..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d)-- Offence u/s 13(1)(d) of the Act - Even if action of authorities concerned is contrary to departmental norms, still it would not justify criminal prosecution, unless it is actuated by dishonest intention to obtain undue pecuniary advantage as dishonest intention is gist of the offence u/s 13(1)(d)..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13, Delhi Technology University Act, 2009, Section 13(4)- - Appointment - Relaxation of qualification - Cognizance of offence - Relaxation of qualification granted in terms applicable rules and regulations and on the recommendations made by Screening Committee as well as Selection Committee - Even, closure report reveals that allegations levelled against..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d)(i)(ii), 20-- Illegal gratification - Presumption - Accused serving as clerk in vacancy section of District Employment Exchange office allegedly demanded Rs.200 to issue call letter for job to complainant - PW1 stated that complainant gave money to accused who kept the same in his shirt pocket - However,..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e)-- Cheating - Assets disproportionate to known source of income - Prosecution case is silent about property which accused had possessed before check period and property which accused had purchased during check period - I.O had nowhere stated as to what was income and expenditure of accused during..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Discharge sought immediately after filing of charge sheet - Court cannot become an Appellate Court and start appreciating evidence by finding out inconsistency in the statements of witnesses - It is not legally permissible - No prima facie case made out for discharge at..........

Showing : 1-10 of 1380 Results