Showing : 51-60 of 1438 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7-- Illegal gratification - Order taking cognizance - Petitioner being a Patwari demanded bribe for issuance of bonafide residence certificate - However, no evidence on record to show that there is any specific demand for making a bonafide residence certificate - Rather, petitioner had mentioned in..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), 13(1)(d)-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - PW2 clearly stated that demand and acceptance made by A-2 on behalf of A-1 - PW3 accompanying witness though turned hostile in cross-examination but in examination in chief he stated that A-2 demanded bribe on direction of A-1 - To that extent..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Accused being Patwari demanded Rs.350 for expenses incurred on preparation of documents for partition - He was not demanding money as bribe - Statements of PWs disbelieved by Court - Receiving of Rs.350 and recovery thereof ipso facto is not sufficient proof of demand -..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 8-- Illegal gratification - Things essential for offence u/s 8 of the Act viz: (i) there must have been solicitation or receipt of gratification; (ii) such gratification must have been asked for or paid as a motive or reward for inducing a public servant to do an act or do a favour or render some..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 8-- Illegal gratification - Vague evidence on record as to for whom accused demanded money and whether person for whom accused demanded and received money is a public servant - In absence of convincing evidence to show that accused had received money from PW4 to induce a public servant to get..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 20-- Illegal gratification - Presumption as to - A-1 demanded bribe of Rs.1000 and same was settled for Rs.500 for expediting the matter for conversion of plot for no, agricultural purpose - Recovery of tainted currency notes from A-2 who accepted the same on behest of A-1 and presence of anthracene..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d), 20-- Illegal gratification - Reduction of sentence - Accused convicted and sentenced to 2 years of imprisonment - Occurrence was of the year 1991 that is about 27 years ago - Considering the passage of time, it is appropriate to reduce the sentence of imprisonment of 2 years to 1 year...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 8, 12, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 120B-- Anticipatory bail - Illegal gratification - Petitioner per se is not a public servant and is not alleged to have received any illegal gratification - Rather, petitioner alleged to have been part of a conspiracy with conversations recorded allegedly to contend that he was negotiating payment of..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(e), 13(2)-- Assets disproportionate to known source of income - Allegation that A-1 acquired disproportionate assets more than his known sources of income and A-2 aided to offence committed by A-1 - All the PWs have deposed about their role played in prosecution case - However, perusal of relevant exhibits..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 197, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 109, 420, 201, 120B, 417, 467, 468, 477A, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2)(d)-- Sanction for prosecution - Offence u/ss 109, 420, 201, 120-B, 417, 467, 468, 477-A IPC and Ss.13(1)(d), 13(2)(d) of P.C Act - Prosecution failed to take sanction to prosecute applicant prior to filing of charge sheet - Even trial Court proceeded to take cognizance on said charge sheet - More so,..........

Showing : 51-60 of 1438 Results