Showing : 71-80 of 1378 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 465, 471, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(c)(d), 13(2)-- Misappropriation and embezzlement of public funds - Sufficient material on record to show that accused had indulged in acts of misappropriation and embezzlement of public funds by unauthorizedly processing bills which he received not through proper channel - Both the Courts below thoroughly..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 465, 471, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(c)(d), 13(2)-- Misappropriation and embezzlement of public funds - Reduction of sentence - Accused aged 70 years, suffering from ill health - He undergone 20 months sentence out of 36 months - Sentence modified to period already undergone by accused...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(d), 13(2)-- Anticipatory bail - In the instant case, petitioners supplied all sensitive information to contractor about internal meetings of committee of officers who laid down norms and terms of contract and facilitated contractor to submit tender documents after modifying the same - Evidence available with..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(b), 13(1)(d), 13(2), Madhya Pradesh Special Police Establishment Act, 1947, Section 3, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 120B, 34-- Corruption and bribery case against Central Government employees - Once charge-sheet is filed merely because investigating agency has no jurisdiction to investigate the matter, charge-sheet cannot be quashed as it is not possible that `cognizance on a i, valid police report is prohibited and..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(1)(b), 13(1)(d), 13(2), Madhya Pradesh Special Police Establishment Act, 1947, Section 3, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 120B, 34-- Corruption and bribery case against Central Government employees - Police has jurisdiction to investigate and conduct trial for offences under Prevention of Corruption Act - Therefore, offence of bribery and corruption against Central Government employees posted by State of M.P. can be..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5(1)(c), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 467, 471, 477A-- Abuse of official position with intention of availing pecuniary benefits - Accused misappropriated Government money by making false documents and by making false payment to labourers by forged LTI's - However, prosecution failed to establish that accused abused their official position with..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 218, 417, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 13(2), 13(1)(d), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3-- Offence u/ss 218, 417 IPC and Ss.12(2), 13(1)(d) PC Act - Appreciation of evidence - Evidence on the record unable to prove the alleged offence - Evidence which could be produced, withheld by the prosecution - Necessary ingredients to attract such offence not proved on record - Conviction set..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 439, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(2), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376(C)-- Bail - Illegal gratification and rape - Petitioner Superintendent of Police against whom there is allegation of taking bribe and commission of rape - Evidence of complainant/material witnesses including their cross-examination completed - There is thus, no point in continuing the detention of..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d).13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Tape recorded conversation - Conversation of demand of Rs.7500 allegedly recorded in Tape recorder - However, there is discrepancy about time of handing over possession of tape recorder along with fact that voice and conversation which was transcribed has not been proved..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 7, 13(1)(d).13(2)-- Illegal gratification - Demand and acceptance - Accused being Industrial Inspector allegedly demanded Rs.7500 from complainant in order to avail loan for auto rickshaw - Complainant himself admitted that accused never demanded money from him - Accused only agreed to help complainant to pass on..........

Showing : 71-80 of 1378 Results