Showing : 81-90 of 433 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Reanalysis of sample by CFL - Allowed with direction to deposit expenses by accused - Held, direction to deposit expenses is contrary to the provision - No expenses are required to be deposited by accused...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482-- Quashment of proceedings - Adulteration - Case pending from last 20 years - Valuable right of petitioner enshrined u/s 13(2) of the Act extinguished as sample not sent for reanalysis to CFL - Proceedings quashed...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7,16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules 1955, R. 14 - Food adulteration - Groundnut oil - Proof - Complainant says that he does not know from whom bottles are purchased - He cannot say whether vendor from whom his office purchased bottles supplies new bottles only or second hand bottles as well -..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7,16-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules 1955, R. 14 - Food adulteration - Procedure for taking sample not followed - Conviction cannot be recorded...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(i)(ia)-- Adulterated - When an article of food is injurious or insect infected or is otherwise unfit for human consumption, then also such article shall be deemed to be adulterated...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13-- Report of CFL not received - Prosecution without receipt of report is illegal...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(ia), 2(l), 2(m)-- Where no standards are prescribed in Appendix-B for an article of food, it cannot be held to be adulterated within the meaning of sub-clauses (l) and (m) of clause (ia) of S.2 of the Act - However, it may be deemed to be adulterated if it falls within any of the other clauses of S.2(ia) of the..........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(ia), 2(l), 2(m)-- Under sub-clauses (l) and (m) of Clause (ia) of S.2 of the Act, an article of food shall be deemed to be adulterated if the quantity or purity of the article falls below the prescribed standard or its constituents are present in quantities not within the prescribed limits of variability...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(i)(ia)-- Adulterated - Various circumstances under which an article of food shall be deemed to be adulterated - Analysed...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13,16,7,2(ia)(a)(m)-- Adulteration of food article - Prosecution instituted after expiry of guarantee period of consumption of food article - Accused lost his valuable right to get sample tested by CFL - Prosecution not sustainable...........

Showing : 81-90 of 433 Results