Showing : 161-170 of 393 Results

GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 23, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14-- Compliance of Rules - Question of fact - Held, whether any rule, even mandatory rule has been complied with or not, is always question of fact and has to be judged from evidence recorded during trial...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 211, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(ii)-- Adulteration of food - Framing of charge - Error or irregularity therein - Held, an error or omission or irregularity in framing charge is not sufficient for upsetting conviction unless prejudice or failure of justice is shown...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 23(1A)-- Taking of sample - Contention that substance which was obtained was edible oil and this substance is required to be so stirred to make it homogeneous - Held, Food Inspector deposed that before taking sample, whole substance in tin was stirred by vendor in his presence - This is sufficient..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 23, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 4(3)-- Compliance of R.4(3) - Proof of - Certificate given by Central Food Laboratory in uncertain terms establishes that seals on samples' container were intact - Seals on cover of sample container as well as on outer cover of sample parcel were also intact and tallied with specimen impression of seal..........
CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2C)-- Power of court to send third sample to Director, Central Food Laboratory to be exercised only if second sample was lost or damaged - Report in respect of second sample received that sample was not fit for analysis - Held, order of Court allowing third sample to be sent for analysis was illegal...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Sample of milk - Found adulterated - Report of public analyst at variance with report of Central Food Laboratory - Report of CFL supersedes report of public analyst...........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Sample of milk - Found adulterated - Food Inspector asked accused to which animal did the milk belong - Accused expressed ignorance - Non fatty sold found only 6.3% whereas it should be minimum of 9% of Buffalo's milk, 8.5% for cow's milk and 9% for Goat's or sheep's milk, 8.5% for mixed milk -..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(7)-- Sample of milk drawn - Efforts made to join independent witnesses - None came forward - Sufficient compliance of Section 10(7) of the Act...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Appendix-B - Sabji Masala - Sample found adulterated - Standard not prescribed for Sabji Masala - Analysis done with reference to standard prescribed for 'Curry Masala' - Held, prosecution in regard to an article for which no standards have been laid,..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16, 7-- Sample of cow's milk found deficient in the milk solids not fat, and not in milk fats - Held, milk was not adulterated...........

Showing : 161-170 of 393 Results