Showing : 301-310 of 400 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 4, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Conviction under Food Adulteration Act - Accused faced trial for 19 years - Accused released on Probation though minimum sentence is provided under the Act...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Catechu (betal-nut) - Sample found adulterated - Not mentioned in Panchnama that the seized substance was catechu (edible) - It cannot be said that seized substance was selling for edible purposes - Accused acquitted...........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Catechu (betal-nut) - Provision of S.13(2) of the Act not complied with - Ex.P16 sent by registered post but original postal receipt not produced and photo copy proved without permission of Court u/s 65 of Evidence Act - Without proof of original document such evidence is not reliable - Accused..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section S.13(2), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1995, Rule 9A-- Sample - Found to be adulterated - Report of Public Analyst sent to accused prior to institution of complaint in Court whereas Rule 9A requires that report of Public Analyst be sent to accused after institution of complaint in Court - Rule 9A is directory - No prejudice caused to accused -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1995, Rule 9A-- Sample - Found to be adulterated - Delay in sending report of Public Analyst or delay in filing complaint in Court - It is irregularity - Accused not entitled to acquittal...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Second analysis - In absence of an application by accused for second analysis of sample by Director, accused cannot complain that he was deprived of his right to have the second sample analysed by the Director - Mere delay and laches on the part of the complainant in getting the summons served was..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), and 7(1), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 44A-- Kesari Dal - Sale forbidden by Rule 44-A which came into force on 6.4.2000 - Sale of Besan mixed with Kesari Dal prior to coming into force of said rule - Conviction set aside...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Sentence - Accused facing trial since 1981 and 64 years of age - He faced trial for a long period and remained in custody for about 22 days - Due to lack of proper legal advise accused deprived from taking a defence which could have been a ground for acquittal also - It would not be proper to send..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(i)(a)(i)-- Milk - Sample contained non solid fat of 8.1% instead of 8.5% and contained solid fat at 4.5% instead of 4% - Acquittal by High Court by giving benefit by assuming that possibility of improper stirring could not be ruled out - Order of High Court set aside - It was factually found by lower Courts..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 23, 7(iv)-- Pan Masala, Gutka (containing tobacco) - Its manufacture, sale and storage banned by State Food (Health) Authority - Notification quashed as (1) Power to ban food article vests in Central Government and not in State Authority; (2) State Authority can ban the article as a transitory measure in..........

Showing : 301-310 of 400 Results