LawMirror.com

Results of prevention of food adulteration act

Showing : 321-330 of 436 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16 -- Sentence - Accused facing trial since 1981 and 64 years of age - He faced trial for a long period and remained in custody for about 22 days - Due to lack of proper legal advise accused deprived from taking a defence which could have been a ground for acquittal also - It would not be proper to send accused behind..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(i)(a)(i) -- Milk - Sample contained non solid fat of 8.1% instead of 8.5% and contained solid fat at 4.5% instead of 4% - Acquittal by High Court by giving benefit by assuming that possibility of improper stirring could not be ruled out - Order of High Court set aside - It was factually found by lower Courts that sample..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 23, 7(iv) -- Pan Masala, Gutka (containing tobacco) - Its manufacture, sale and storage banned by State Food (Health) Authority - Notification quashed as (1) Power to ban food article vests in Central Government and not in State Authority; (2) State Authority can ban the article as a transitory measure in emergent..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(v) -- Pan Masala, Gutka and Supari - Since eaten for taste and nourishment as such they are food within the meaning of S.2(v) of the act...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(iv), Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003, Section 6 -- Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products Act is enacted with intention to bring out a comprehensive enactment to deal with tobacco and tobacco products..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7 -- Atta - Report of Public Analyst that sample is adulterated as it showed presence of nine insects, six living and three dead weevils - In absence of report of Public Analyst that sample was insect-infested and unfit for human consumption on account of presence of insects, accused cannot be convicted...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 17(4) -- Company - Prosecution of Directors - Food Inspector visited shop of vendor and stockist of company and took sample of Jam which was found to be adulterated - In complaint no whisper against Directors of Company that they are responsible for commission of offence - Order issuing process against Directors quashed...........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 14, 16(1)(a)(i), 19(2) -- Oil - Sample taken from sealed tin - Bill produced - Manufacturer arrayed as an accused, expired - Petitioner cannot be held liable - Proceedings quashed and set aside...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 -- Item A.20.01 Appendix B - Synthetic vinegar - Word 'Non-fruit' used in label and not 'synthetic' as per provisions of Food Products Order - Cannot be said to have committed any offence under the Act because provisions of Food Products Order overrides the provisions of the Act...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(ix)(g) -- Synthetic vinegar - Marking of label as 'non fruit' instead of 'synthetic' does not amount to misbranding...........

Showing : 321-330 of 436 Results