Showing : 181-190 of 228 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1A)(i)-- Arhar dal - Sample found to be adulterated - Accused convicted and sentenced to 9 months RI - Offence 10 years old - Sentence reduced to already undergone...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16-- Salt - Sample not containing required quantity of Iodine - First accused Naresh Kumar relied on invoice issued by appellant - Invoice issued in the name of one Darshan Lal - No evidence as to who is Darshan Lal - In the bill it is not specifically stated that salt is sold in packed condition -..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Sample found to be adulterated - Complaint did not state that milk was shaken up clock-wise and anti clock-wise to make it homogeneous - This lacuna cannot be filled up by Food Inspector during his examination - Acquittal upheld...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Chana Dal - Sample contained some grains of Kesri Dal - Report of Central Food Laboratory that sample is substandard - Accused running Karyana shop and selling different Dals (Pulses) - If some grains of Kesri Dal mix in Chana Dal it cannot be said that accused had mixed Kesri Dal in Chana Dal to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Haldi powder - Sample found to be not free from presence of foreign ingredient identified as tapioca starch - If sample is within the prescribed limit of purity and mere presence of tapioca starch in the absence of its quantity either by weight or percentage cannot be taken as a ground to say that..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 468-- Tea - Sample found to be adulterated - Complaint lodged after 3 years and two months - Limitation u/s 468 Cr.P.C. is 3 years - Complaint quashed...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7-- Ladoos - Report of Public Analyst that it contained unpermitted colour - Non mention in the report that it is injurious to health - It is not fatal to the prosecution case as adding of any colouring material is prohibited under the Act and Rules as it is harmful to human health...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(2), 16(1)(a)(i), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 9(f)-- Milk intended to be sold as such - Failure of Food Inspector to enquire and satisfy himself - Version of accused that the milk was not to be sold as such has to be accepted - If on enquiry vendor does not make necessary disclosures or pleads ignorance only then question of presumption under Note I..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 9(f)-- It is obligatory for the Food Inspector to make enquiries and only in case vendor refuses to make necessary disclosures, presumption under the Note can be raised - When the vendor was not asked regarding the source of milk, it is wrong to apply the standard prescribed for buffalo milk to the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Ghee - Sample found to be adulterated - Notice regarding filing of complaint must be given to the petitioner and notice must state which Court accused should approach for sending the sample to the Central Food Laboratory - If notice is not given it will cause prejudice to the accused - Prosecution..........

Showing : 181-190 of 228 Results