Showing : 181-190 of 215 Results

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7-- Ladoos - Report of Public Analyst that it contained unpermitted colour - Non mention in the report that it is injurious to health - It is not fatal to the prosecution case as adding of any colouring material is prohibited under the Act and Rules as it is harmful to human health...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 9(f)-- It is obligatory for the Food Inspector to make enquiries and only in case vendor refuses to make necessary disclosures, presumption under the Note can be raised - When the vendor was not asked regarding the source of milk, it is wrong to apply the standard prescribed for buffalo milk to the..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 10(2), 16(1)(a)(i), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 9(f)-- Milk intended to be sold as such - Failure of Food Inspector to enquire and satisfy himself - Version of accused that the milk was not to be sold as such has to be accepted - If on enquiry vendor does not make necessary disclosures or pleads ignorance only then question of presumption under Note I..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Ghee - Sample found to be adulterated - Notice regarding filing of complaint must be given to the petitioner and notice must state which Court accused should approach for sending the sample to the Central Food Laboratory - If notice is not given it will cause prejudice to the accused - Prosecution..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)-- Ghee - Sample taken from a tin - No evidence that entire tin was heated and stirred - Prosecution of accused quashed...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 19(2)-- Retailer - Opened the container and sold the goods in retail - Does not lose the protection of S.19(2) provided he proves that he purchased the article of food with warranty from a duly licensed manufacturer, distributor or dealer and the article of food was properly stored while in his possession..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14-- Rule 14 is mandatory and if it is proved that mandate of this rule is not complied with, accused is entitled to acquittal - Not only the container in which the sample of food articles are taken, intermediary vessels, spoon etc. where food articles are handled for mixing, stirring or otherwise for..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Conviction - Accused sentenced to 8 months RI and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- - Accused faced trial for 15 years and suffered both mentally and physically - Sentence reduced to already undergone but amount of fine increased to Rs.10,000/- - In default of payment of fine, petitioner will undergo the..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Before taking sample milk stirred and made homogeneous - No evidence that sample was taken after making the milk stirred with clean stick and stirring was in clockwise and anti-clockwise in such a way that milk at the bottom was thoroughly mixed - Conviction set aside...........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 14-- Milk - Sample - To be drawn in clean and odourless glass bottles - Rule 14 is mandatory - Violation of mandatory provision - Order of acquittal, cannot be said to be in any way perverse or unreasonable or unjustified...........

Showing : 181-190 of 215 Results