LawMirror.com

Results of pronote

Showing : 31-40 of 175 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2012
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 118,4 -- Pronote - Amount borrowed in the month of March and pronote executed in the month of August as defendant failed to keep his promise to return the borrowed amount within three/four months - Consideration not paid in presence of witnesses at the time of execution of pronote as it was paid earlier - Evidence of witnesses in..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45 -- Dishonour of cheque - Expert opinion - Borrowing of money - Pronote executed - Subsequently cheque issued for the balance amount - Having admitted the signature available in the dishonoured cheque, accused cannot seek an order to send the promissory note, an earlier document for expert..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 118,87, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114 -- Pronote - Expert opinion that name of plaintiff on the promissory note and receipt were written later than the other writing on the pronote and in different ink - Expert to counter his opinion not examined - Held, plea set up by defendant that he never executed promissory note in favour..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 118, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114 -- Promissory note - Consideration - One of the two marginal witnesses did not sign which proves that either consideration was not paid in his presence and he refused to sign or he was not present at the time of execution of pronote - Other marginal witness admitted in cross examination that..........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 87 -- Pronote - Additions and alterations - It is for the plaintiff to explain about additions and alterations - Non explanation of the same invites adverse inference...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Concurrent findings of fact - Courts below recorded concurrent findings of fact that defendant borrowed the amount from plaintiff - Execution of pronote receipt and passing of amount of consideration is duly proved on record - Held, such pure concurrent findings of fact based on appraisal of evidence cannot..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Civil suit for recovery - Advancing loan against issuance of cheque - Non execution of pronote in addition to handing over the cheque - Parties were relatives and residing in opposite houses - Held, in the absence of pronote, apart from the cheque would not any way defeat the case...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 118, 4 -- Pronote - If passing of consideration amount is not duly proved, even if execution of pronote and receipt is proved, then it remains just a paper transaction which cannot be enforced against the executant...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 118, 4 -- Pronote - Past consideration - Once plaintiff received the amount of earlier promotes and receipts, then question of past consideration, in lieu of present pronote and receipt does not arise at all...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 118 -- Execution of pronote - Presumption as to - Both Courts below gave concurrent finding of fact that plaintiff has been able to prove execution of pronote and receipt and passing consideration - Defendant simply denied execution of pronote and receipt - Pronote and receipt are thumb marked by defendant - He has not chosen to..........

Showing : 31-40 of 175 Results